My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Planning Commission Agenda and Packet 2025 09 11
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
PLANNING COMMISSION
>
2025 Planning Commission Agendas Packets Minutes
>
Planning Commission Agenda and Packet 2025 09 11
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/5/2025 2:56:33 PM
Creation date
9/5/2025 2:29:13 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Meeting Date
9/11/2025
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
61
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Planning Commission <br />Meeting Minutes <br />May 8, 2025 <br />Page 6 of 8 <br />Choi asked whether there would be a change in lumen output from the new signs. <br />Cline -Gibson said that there would not be any change. <br />Moline asked about the requirement for architectural base and border in the new code. <br />Cline -Gibson said that this was a requirement for freestanding signs, but was largely <br />targeted at entrance signs rather than the wayfinding signs proposed here, hence the <br />waiver. <br />Brauneis wondered about the need and value of the sign facing the golf course and open <br />space. <br />Cline -Gibson deferred to the applicant, but suggested that it was meant to be viewed <br />from US-36. <br />Applicant Presentation: <br />Mark Smith, resident, CEO of Advent Health Avista, spoke to the importance of clear and <br />visible signage for the hospital campus. <br />Commissioner Questions of Applicant: <br />Brauneis asked about the need for the sign facing the golf course. <br />Smith said that their desire was for the sign to be visible from US-36, as it is otherwise <br />difficult to see the building from the freeway. <br />Brauneis asked whether the sign adjacent to US-36 would accomplish this. <br />Smith said that they would prefer to have both. <br />Hunt asked to confirm that the wall sign would directed towards eastbound US-36 traffic. <br />Smith said yes. <br />Moline asked whether there was an existing wall sign. <br />Brauneis said no. <br />Public Comment: <br />None were heard. <br />Applicant Closing Statement: <br />Smith thanked the Commission for their time. <br />Staff Closing Statement: <br />None was heard. <br />Additional Commissioner Questions of Staff: <br />Bangs asked whether there was any other illuminated signage in Louisville that faced <br />US-36. <br />Cline -Gibson said not that she could recall. <br />Mihaly asked how the wall sign would look if it conformed to the sign code. <br />Cline -Gibson said that it would be somewhat smaller. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.