Laserfiche WebLink
In 2010, the City rezoned the property to PCZD-C and approved the ConocoPhillips <br />Campus GDP, a Zoning Agreement, Preliminary Subdivision Plat, and Preliminary <br />Planned Unit Development (PUD) for the ConocoPhillips development. The GDP <br />included an approximately 2.5 million sq. ft. development cap, set allowed land uses, <br />setbacks, parking standards, and required a minimum public land dedication of 12%, <br />matching the minimum code requirement. ConocoPhillips later abandoned its <br />development plans and sold the property. The Preliminary Subdivision Plat, and <br />Preliminary PUD were never finalized and have since expired. <br />■ 2010 — ConocoPhillips Campus GDP <br />In 2024, the City approved a final plat for the Redtail Ridge development, with the intent <br />to develop the property consistent with the standards set by the ConocoPhillips Campus <br />GDP. The plat approval included dedication of 139 acres of public use lands, created <br />multiple development parcels, dedication of public road rights of way, including an <br />extension of Campus Drive, an agreement for expansion of the City's wastewater <br />treatment plant, and public utility and access easements. <br />■ 2024 — Redtail Ridge, Filing No. 1 <br />Ordinance No. 1996, Series 2025 <br />On July 8, 2025, the City Council adopted Ordinance 1896, Series 2025, which <br />amended Section 17.72.190 of the Louisville Municipal Code regarding Yard and Bulk <br />requirements for GDPs. Specifically, this ordinance amendment allows Yard and Bulk <br />requirements (e.g. setbacks, lot coverage, and building heights) to be set through the <br />approval of a GDP or GDP amendment. <br />Prior to this code amendment, GDPs were prohibited from establishing Yard and Bulk <br />standards that were inconsistent with certain underlying zoning requirements. <br />Deviations to the Yard and Bulk standards could only be approved through the waiver <br />process at the time of PUD approval. This was found to be inconsistent with the intent <br />of GDPs to create custom zoning standards for the district that will define the type and <br />character of the development. The limitation also led to GDPs that did not provide the <br />landowner clear guidance on the desired development standards and uncertainty in the <br />development review process. <br />Under the new code language, a GDP amendment can set the building height limits as <br />a zoning standard based on the desired character for the district. The proposed <br />amendment to the ConcoPhillips Campus GDP would set specific building height and <br />building massing standards specific to Lot 1, Block 2 of the Redtail Ridge development. <br />The remainder of the development would be subject the Yard and Bulk standards noted <br />on the original GDP <br />PROPOSAL: <br />Avista Adventist Hospital GDP <br />The proposal includes reducing the maximum allowed building area on the Avista <br />Adventist Hospital GDP and is intended to serve as a "density swap" where the unused <br />development area is transferred to the ConocoPhillips Campus GDP. The new net <br />4 <br />