Laserfiche WebLink
City Council <br /> Meeting Minutes <br /> October 18, 2011 <br /> • Page 4 of 17 <br /> The HPF will receive approximately $375,000 annually from Sales Tax, State Grants, <br /> and miscellaneous funds through 2019. 12% of the fund is allocated for administrative <br /> and 6.5% allocated for professional services, resulting in approximately $300,000 <br /> available annually for grant distribution. Approximately $2.4 million will be available for <br /> grant funding through the term of the HPF. <br /> Staff recommended City Council allocate 60% of the grant funding for residential <br /> structures and 40% for commercial structures. $1.4 million would be available for <br /> residential properties over the next 8 years, allocating an estimated 64 landmarked <br /> structures an average of about $22,500 per residential structure. Allocating 40% of the <br /> HPF to commercial structures would result in approximately $975,000 over the next <br /> eight years. <br /> The recently completed Historic Structure Assessment (HSA) for the Grain Elevator <br /> projects approximately $685,000 is needed to make it structurally sound. If 40% of the <br /> projected HPF funds are planned for commercial structures, and if $685,000 is devoted <br /> to the Grain Elevator project, it would leave approximately $290,000 for other <br /> commercial buildings. Staff recommended approval of Resolution 70, Series 2011. <br /> PUBLIC COMMENT <br /> • Steve Costello, 902 Grove Drive, Louisville, CO voiced his confusion with the <br /> calculations presented for incentives and asked if there was a cap. Principal Planner <br /> McCartney explained the formula attempts to determine how many properties may be <br /> landmarked. Councilor Muckle explained there are not any caps on requests. <br /> Mr. Costello voiced his concern over the amount of incentives for commercial property. <br /> He noted commercial properties generate revenue for the owners, whereas residential <br /> property will not receive on-going revenue for landmarking their property. He was <br /> concerned that revenue, which supports the entire historical preservation program, <br /> comes from business outside of the downtown area and those businesses would not <br /> have the ability to apply for HPC funds. He urged Council to look at the disparity <br /> between the incentives and find some common ground. <br /> Michael Menaker, 1827 W. Choke Cherry Drive, Louisville, CO also voiced his concern <br /> over the proposal for commercial incentives. He explained ballot language for the <br /> Historic Preservation outlines four permitted uses for funds: 1) Provide incentives to <br /> preserve historic resources; 2) Provide incentives to preserve buildings that contribute <br /> to the character but are not deemed to be historic; 3) Staff time necessary to administer <br /> the program; 4) Provide incentives for new buildings and developments within Old Town <br /> Louisville to limit mass, scale, and number of stories; to preserve setbacks; to preserve <br /> pedestrian walkways between buildings and to utilize materials typical of historic <br /> buildings, above mandatory requirements. He stated there are opportunities to use the <br /> • funds downtown. <br />