Laserfiche WebLink
City Council <br /> Meeting Minutes <br /> January 3, 2012 <br /> Page 6 of 14 <br /> Mayor Muckle opened the public hearing a requested a staff presentation. <br /> Planning Director Russ explained Ordinance No. 1611, Series 2011 proposes an <br /> amendment to the Louisville Municipal Code (LMC) to include provisions regarding <br /> requests for reasonable accommodation provided by the Federal Fair Housing Act. The <br /> current code does not include provisions adopted under the Federal Fair Housing Act <br /> (FHA) and used by U.S. Department of Justice and U.S. Department of Housing and <br /> Urban Development's Office of Fair Housing and Equal Opportunity for certain protected <br /> individuals. The definition section in the LMC, addresses the age limits for Child Care <br /> Centers and Family Care Homes is 16 years. <br /> The City Attorney offered language, which would give the City Manager, or his <br /> designee, the ability to administratively approve minor modifications to building setback, <br /> height, lot coverage or occupancy requirements in order to provide reasonable <br /> accommodations consistent with the FHA. Chapter 17.52 of the Louisville Municipal <br /> Code would be amended by the addition of a new subsection 17.52.055 to provide: <br /> A) The City Manager, or designee, in consultation with the Planning and Building Safety <br /> Department, authorization to approve minor modifications of building setback, height or <br /> lot coverage requirements, up to ten percent of the applicable requirement, or of <br /> occupancy limits, up to four unrelated individuals, in order to provide reasonable <br /> accommodations without the need for an additional approval process. <br /> B) The City Manager, or designee, may approve a type of reasonable accommodation <br /> different from that requested by the applicant if the City Manager or designee concludes <br /> a different form of accommodation would satisfy the requirements of the Federal Fair <br /> Housing Act with fewer impacts on adjacent neighborhoods. The decision of the City <br /> Manager or designee shall be final for purposes of judicial review. <br /> C)Any approvals granted under this section shall be transmitted to the Planning <br /> Commission and City Council for their information by written memorandum from the City <br /> Manager. <br /> The Planning Commission reviewed the ordinance at public hearings on November 17, <br /> and December 8, 2011, and voted to recommend against approval of the proposed <br /> ordinance and identified three primary concerns with the draft ordinance: <br /> 1) The ordinance would create an administrative process that in certain <br /> circumstances would replace existing public processes therefore eliminating the <br /> opportunity for public input and participation. <br /> 2) The draft ordinance did not clearly define "minor modifications" of building <br /> setbacks, height, lot coverage, or occupancy limit. <br /> 3) The draft ordinance lacked a municipal appeal process. <br /> Staff added language in the Code to require the City Manager report back to Planning <br />