My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Minutes 2012 08 07
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
MINUTES (45.090)
>
2012 City Council Minutes
>
City Council Minutes 2012 08 07
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 2:44:32 PM
Creation date
8/22/2012 10:51:59 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Minutes
Original Hardcopy Storage
7D4
Supplemental fields
Test
CCMIN 2012 08 07
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
City Council <br />Meeting Minutes <br />August 7, 2012 <br />Page 10 of 18 <br />commercial uses. He felt the purpose of the grain elevator was a grain elevator and <br />nothing else. <br />Robert Sandford, 322 S. Jefferson Avenue, Louisville, CO stated the City should not be <br />in the business of creating commercial businesses, which are difficult to market. He felt <br />the Council is trying to balance business with the historical. <br />Jean Morgan, 1131 Spruce Street, Louisville, CO voiced her support for the staff <br />recommendation. She supported the second option, which provided the City more time. <br />She supported the preservation of the property. <br />Mary Kay Knorr, 1209 LaFarge Avenue, Louisville, CO voiced her support for Option 2, <br />which provides more time. She supported partnering to preserve the elevator. <br />Ashley Stolzmann, 370 S. Taft Court, Louisville, CO supported Option 2, which provides <br />an option to sell the grain elevator and other opportunities. <br />Gail Wetrogan, 930 McKinley Avenue, Louisville, CO urged Council to vote no on this <br />proposal. She addressed the number of unknowns and felt this project could get out of <br />control. She did not feel the project was worthwhile. <br />Michael Kranzdorf, Amterre Propety Group LLC thanked Council and members of <br />public. He stated their goal is to partner with the City to save the grain elevator. <br />Steve Costello, 902 Grove Drive, Louisville, CO voiced his opposition to this proposal. <br />He noted the historic preservation tax passed because the loss of the middle school's <br />historic fagade. He stated the tax was poorly conceived with no real purpose. He felt the <br />public voted for the tax to preserve historic building for public purposes, not private <br />purposes. He did not feel the City Council should be in the real estate business. <br />COUNCIL COMMENTS <br />Mayor Muckle stated the Historic Preservation Ballot Issue clearly outlined the purpose <br />of the tax to provide incentives for landmarking residential and commercial properties. <br />He also noted several homes were voluntarily landmarked. He stated the <br />Rex Theater restoration is one example of preservation of a commercial property. <br />Mayor Pro Tem Dalton stated Option 1 would provide an experienced historic <br />preservation developer. Whatever option is chosen, the same amount of historic <br />preservation funds will be used. He stated the Council's business is to manage City <br />business, not developing property. He was concerned if the City purchased the <br />property, its upkeep will compete with other city departments for budgetary funds. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.