Laserfiche WebLink
City Council <br />Meeting Minutes <br />August 7, 2012 <br />Page 10 of 18 <br />commercial uses. He felt the purpose of the grain elevator was a grain elevator and <br />nothing else. <br />Robert Sandford, 322 S. Jefferson Avenue, Louisville, CO stated the City should not be <br />in the business of creating commercial businesses, which are difficult to market. He felt <br />the Council is trying to balance business with the historical. <br />Jean Morgan, 1131 Spruce Street, Louisville, CO voiced her support for the staff <br />recommendation. She supported the second option, which provided the City more time. <br />She supported the preservation of the property. <br />Mary Kay Knorr, 1209 LaFarge Avenue, Louisville, CO voiced her support for Option 2, <br />which provides more time. She supported partnering to preserve the elevator. <br />Ashley Stolzmann, 370 S. Taft Court, Louisville, CO supported Option 2, which provides <br />an option to sell the grain elevator and other opportunities. <br />Gail Wetrogan, 930 McKinley Avenue, Louisville, CO urged Council to vote no on this <br />proposal. She addressed the number of unknowns and felt this project could get out of <br />control. She did not feel the project was worthwhile. <br />Michael Kranzdorf, Amterre Propety Group LLC thanked Council and members of <br />public. He stated their goal is to partner with the City to save the grain elevator. <br />Steve Costello, 902 Grove Drive, Louisville, CO voiced his opposition to this proposal. <br />He noted the historic preservation tax passed because the loss of the middle school's <br />historic fagade. He stated the tax was poorly conceived with no real purpose. He felt the <br />public voted for the tax to preserve historic building for public purposes, not private <br />purposes. He did not feel the City Council should be in the real estate business. <br />COUNCIL COMMENTS <br />Mayor Muckle stated the Historic Preservation Ballot Issue clearly outlined the purpose <br />of the tax to provide incentives for landmarking residential and commercial properties. <br />He also noted several homes were voluntarily landmarked. He stated the <br />Rex Theater restoration is one example of preservation of a commercial property. <br />Mayor Pro Tem Dalton stated Option 1 would provide an experienced historic <br />preservation developer. Whatever option is chosen, the same amount of historic <br />preservation funds will be used. He stated the Council's business is to manage City <br />business, not developing property. He was concerned if the City purchased the <br />property, its upkeep will compete with other city departments for budgetary funds. <br />