City Council Minutes 2001 10 02 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Louisville City Council Meeting October 2, 2001 Page 7 numerous barrels and containers labeled as containing oils, concrete mixtures and paint; and 3) 5 storage tanks which, at one point, contained petroleum products. With regard to grading, Wood stated that there was substantial discussion with the Parks Department as to how Parcel A should be graded. The Open Space Advisory board reviewed the proposal and recommended that Parcel A be used as park rather than open space, which would require a more passive use. Wood stated that the applicant, Parks Department and Engineers worked hard on the grading issue for Parcel A. He stated that the grading plan was revised to provide a more gradual transition between Parcel A and the residences to the east, and to possibly provide a more suitable space for a playground, bike path, or other such use. The applicant would be responsible for the cost of grading improvements. Wood reported that staff and the applicant met with Mr. Mayhoffer concerning the ditch along the north property line, and the ditch company's concerns about access and flow. Also considered, was the desire of neighbors to retain as much of the visual cover as possible while providing an appropriate level of maintenance to ensure safety of the surrounding area. In that regard, Wood stated that the applicant has agreed to contribute a total of $4,000, 50% of the estimated cost, to remove or prune any unsafe trees. Concerning the PUD required in the Annexation Agreement, the fencing plan proposes an open type fence between Parcel A and all the adjoining lots. This fence would be a 5' split rail fence that will be installed and maintained by the HOA. All other locations would be restricted to a 4' split rail fence. Wood stated that the applicant is requesting setback relief from the underlying SF-E zoning requirements. Wood noted that the proposed setbacks would comply with SF-LD zone district, which has a larger lot size than the approved 18,000 SF lots. The proposed setbacks for Lots 1-5 would be 30' front, 25' rear, and 40' combined for the sides. For Lots 6-8, the proposed setbacks would be 25' rear and 40' combined for the sides. Wood stated that the applicant is requesting the setbacks based on the smaller lot sizes, grading considerations, and the desire to move the fronts of the homes with sloping backyards closer to the street allowing a larger backyard area. Wood stated that Resolution No. 48, Series 2001, brings forth one condition of approval, that prior to the issuance of an overlot grading permit, the applicant shall certify to the City completion of all abatement recommendations as identified within the Phase I assessment report. Davidson stated that he had asked City Attorney Light to speak to Council on the matter of action on this item as it relates to the upcoming election and related ballot issue. Attorney Light stated that it would be an inappropriate use of authority for Council to delay or place a moratorium on the process of applications for this, or any, property based