My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Planning Commission Minutes 2012 10 11
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
PLANNING COMMISSION
>
2000-2019 Planning Commission
>
2012 Planning Commission Agendas Packets Minutes
>
Planning Commission Minutes 2012 10 11
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 9:55:20 AM
Creation date
1/31/2013 8:53:45 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
Supplemental fields
Test
PCMIN 2012 10 11
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Planning Commission <br />Meeting Minutes <br />October 11, 2012 <br />Page 6 of 11 <br /> <br />benefit to the community. This density issue is something our commission has <br />discussed often. He is not comfortable with this change. <br />Russell stated he does not see the use of a garage as storage as an issue. In <br />regards to density he is not sure if the commission really understands why multi- <br />family is so needed. His general concern is he believes history is lost the more a <br />development is amended. It would be helpful to know the intent of the original <br />approval. He supports this development because it involves good planning. The <br />only unresolved issue is the single access for the multi-family development and the <br />impact on the neighborhoods. <br />Tengler stated his support based on the amount of diversity of the housing stock. He <br />believes the developer is on the tip of the spear of what the market needs for this <br />community. He requested a better background summary of the history of each <br />development, including the phasing. <br />Moline stated the project will bring in a lot of people and the pocket parks seem to be <br />too small. He understands Hecla Lake will be the place where the residents will use <br />but it is not open yet. <br />O’Connell stated she would like to have a better history in future staff reports. She <br />believes this is an appropriate style of density for this development rather than just <br />putting in a ton of multi-plexes. She is a little concerned about the single point of <br />access. <br />Pritchard is in support of this project and believes it is going in the right direction. <br />Planning Commission – Action <br />Tengler moved and Moline seconded a motion to approve the request as presented <br />by staff. <br />Roll Call Vote <br /> <br />Name Vote <br />Jeff Lipton EX <br />Chris Pritchard Yes <br />Jeff Moline Yes <br />Ann O’Connell Yes <br />Cary Tengler Yes <br />Steve Brauneis No <br />Scott Russell Yes <br />Motion passed/failed: 5 to 1 <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />Resolution No. 19, Series 2012, <br />Pearl Izumi – A request for an amended <br />final planned unit development (PUD) plan to allow for the construction of a <br />55,400 SF building in Phase I and a 10,500 SF addition in Phase 2 to be used <br />as the headquarters for the company. 101, 1738 1797 Taylor Ave; Lots 15, 16 <br />and 17, Block 1, the Business Center at CTC. Case No. 12-022-FP. <br /> <br /> Applicant: Pearl Izumi (Bill Mascarenaz) <br /> <br /> Representative: Arch11, Inc. (Kimble Hobbs and EJ Meade <br /> <br /> Owner: E. J. Louisville Land, LLC (Jim Vasbinder) <br /> <br /> Case Manager: Scott Robinson, Planner I <br />Public Notice Certification <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.