Laserfiche WebLink
Planning Commission <br />Meeting Minutes <br />December 13, 2012 <br />Page 5 of 8 <br /> <br />Jones stated the sign has been design to be within scale of the wall. Anything smaller <br />looses the effectiveness of the sign. <br />Closed Public Hearing – Planning Commission Discussion <br />Moline recommended approval of the application as presented by staff with some <br />minor changes to the conditions. <br />Brauneis stated concern with the sign size and the overflow parking spaces. He <br />stated the size of the sign will probably not make or break the business of the Art <br />Center. He suggested the eight (8) overflow parking spaces not be required because <br />as the rest of the site develops those spaces will be added. <br />O’Connell stated she sees a value in the proposed sign size. She would like to see <br />the conditions include additional wording that the sign is to be painted on the wall and <br />no other material is to be used. She also stated her support to waive the requirement <br />for the eight (8) overflow parking spaces. <br />Pritchard stated he supports the project; it is needed in the community. He also <br />supports the conditions as proposed by staff. He recommended moving the project <br />forward to City Council with staff reporting the discussion the Planning Commission <br />has had regarding the signage. <br />Planning Commission – Action <br />Moline moved and Brauneis seconded a motion to approve Resolution No. 23, Series <br />2012 a resolution recommending approval of a final subdivision plat and final planned <br />unit development (PUD) amendment to allow for the development of a <br />commercial/retail development known as the Steel Ranch Marketplace with the <br />following modifications to the five (5) conditions proposed by staff: <br />Conditions #1, 4 and 5: no changes <br /> <br /> <br />Condition #2: remove the wording “parking lot and all” <br /> <br /> <br />Condition #3: remove the entire condition. <br /> <br /> <br />Roll Call Vote <br /> <br />Name Vote <br />Jeff Lipton Excused <br />Chris Pritchard No <br />Jeff Moline Yes <br />Ann O’Connell No <br />Cary Tengler Excused <br />Steve Brauneis Yes <br />Scott Russell Excused <br />Motion tied: 2 to 2 <br /> <br />A discussion followed regarding the outcome of the motion and the need to move the <br />project forward to City Council. <br />Pritchard called for another roll call vote on the original motion. <br />Staff clarified with the Commissioners their understanding of what they are voting on: <br />the original motion. <br /> <br /> <br />