My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Agenda and Packet 2013 04 16 - PG 222 - ATTACHMENT #8
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
AGENDAS & PACKETS (45.010)
>
2010-2019 City Council Agendas and Packets
>
2013 City Council Agendas and Packets
>
City Council Agenda and Packet 2013 04 16 - PG 222 - ATTACHMENT #8
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 2:08:05 PM
Creation date
6/21/2013 1:39:57 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Packet
Original Hardcopy Storage
6D4
Record Series Code
45.010
Supplemental fields
Test
CCAGPKT 2013 04 16 - PG 222 - ATTACHMENT #8
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
23
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
• SUBJECT: 2012 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN FRAMEWORK <br /> DATE: DECEMBER 18, 2012 PAGE 16 OF 23 <br /> Sustainable Practices for the Economy, Community, and the Environment— Option #2 <br /> provides no guidance for the continued private investment and reinvestment in <br /> McCaslin / Centennial Valley area when compared to Framework Options #3, #4, and <br /> #5. <br /> Unique Commercial Areas and Distinctive Neighborhoods — Option #2 does not provide <br /> guidance, or encouragement for the McCaslin /Centennial Valley portion of the City to <br /> transform from a conventional suburban strip corridor to a unique commercial area. <br /> Families and Individuals— Option #2, while better than Option #1, limits diversified <br /> housing options for first time home buyers and seniors when compared to Options #3, <br /> #4, and #5. <br /> Safe Neighborhoods— Option #2 provides for safe neighborhoods throughout the City. <br /> It should be noted that Option #2, when compared to Options #3, #4, and #5, does not <br /> strengthen neighborhoods adjacent the McCaslin and Centennial Valley retail and <br /> commercial areas by enabling better edges and transitions along redeveloping <br /> corridors and allowed commercial development. <br /> Option #3 — Three Centers — Option #3 meets the intent of the Vision Statement and <br /> Core Community Values. Staff believes that Option #3 out performs all options in the <br /> near-term. However, staff also believes that Option #3 is out performed by Options #4 <br /> and #5 in meeting the City's Vision Statement and Core Community Values in the long- <br /> term. <br /> A Sense of Community— Option #3 maintains the sense of community throughout the <br /> City and strengthens the sense of community for the South Boulder Road / Hwy 42 <br /> Corridor, and the McCaslin Corridor south of Cherry Street. However, staff believes that <br /> Option #3 is outperformed in enabling a stronger sense of community in the long-term <br /> when compared to Options #4 and #5, specifically related to Centennial Valley and the <br /> McCaslin Corridor north of Cherry Street. <br /> Our Livable Small Town Feel— The physical condition of the City is a key measure in <br /> maintaining the small town character of the City. Option #3 encourages a change in the <br /> physical character of the McCaslin Corridor to become more livable and physically <br /> compatible with the rest of the City. However, Option #3 does not address the difficult <br /> relationship between Centennial Valley and residential areas west of McCaslin in the <br /> long-term. <br /> A Healthy, Vibrant, and Sustainable Economy— Option #3 provides guidance for the <br /> continued private investment and reinvestment in the McCaslin corridor, south of Cherry <br /> Street when compared to Framework Options #1 and #2. <br /> CITY COUNCIL COMMUNICATION <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.