Historic Preservation Commission Agenda and Packet 2013 07 15

Home Browse Search

Historic Preservation Commission Meeting Minutes June 17, 2013 Page 5 of 9 Haley recommended doing the project in phases and wondered if the HPC could reimburse the work. Watson stated he was not comfortable in doing reimbursements. He stated using the signing bonus would make the most logical sense. Villa stated he was not worried about the money. Haley stated she understands but wants to make sure the project is done appropriately and the money is used most wisely. Stewart stated he still recommends approving a landmark request with a condition allowing $6,500 of the $65,000 for painting, subject to complying with specific criteria for the job itself. He added he did not believe the job described in the cost estimate was adequate for preservation purposes. La Grave agreed and stated City Council can make the final determination. Koertje addressed the landmark application and discussed its attributes in regard to the landmark review criteria. He added he still has reservations approving a grant which was not applied for. Stewart made a motion to approve the landmark request, named Lackner Tavern. La Grave seconded the motion. Motion carried 6 – 0. La Grave made a motion to release $6,500 to paint the north and east facing facades, with the understanding services must meet preservation standards. Haley stated the amount should be less if they are only painting the north and east façade. Griffin stated he was not sure the painting contractor who submitted the cost estimate is the appropriate contractor for the job, based on the description of the activities. La Grave revised his motion to state “release of up to $6,500” so the bid could not exceed $6,500. Stewart added this is to achieve curb appeal for the structure. Watson inquired why the services were limited to only two sides. Haley stated to ensure the entire structure would not be painted twice. Stewart seconded the motion. Griffin asked Villa what he thought of the actions.