My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Minutes 2002 09 03
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
MINUTES (45.090)
>
2002 City Council Minutes
>
City Council Minutes 2002 09 03
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 2:41:41 PM
Creation date
11/26/2003 9:34:44 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Minutes
Signed Date
9/3/2002
Original Hardcopy Storage
7B6
Supplemental fields
Test
CCMIN 2002 09 03
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Louisville City Council Meeting <br />September 3, 2002 <br />Page 5 <br /> <br />Johnstone reviewed the criteria listed in the CDDSG and the PUD section of the <br />Municipal Code, which allows the option of requesting an additional wall sign for a retail <br />center, however, Staff has questioned the "precedent" that may be started with this <br />amendment. The Planning Commission reviewed the request and recommended approval <br />of the amendment to the City Council. The Commission felt that the sign was needed to <br />provide adequate visibility for Atlanta Bread's business. The recommended approval of <br />this sign was for the Atlanta Bread Company only, and if the applicant no longer <br />occupies the building, it was conditioned that the entire sign package must be removed <br />and the wall must be repaired to it's original state. <br /> <br />Johnstone discussed whether the sign should be individual letters or if the sign should be <br />placed on a stucco and wire-mesh background, mounted directly to the brick wall. The <br />Planning Commission chose the wire-mesh background as an attempt to match the <br />adjacent eligible sign areas. Staff questions the design of this wire-mesh design for the <br />signage in this location and believes that the design would not match the building <br />architecture. He stated that Resolution No. 30, Series 2002, includes the following two <br />conditions forwarded from the Planning Commission: <br /> <br />1. Sign to be installed on Wire Mesh Background <br />2. Sign is approved for this applicant only - the Atlanta Bread Company <br /> <br />Davidson called for Applicant presentation. <br /> <br />Joe Vessels, Co-Owner of Atlanta Bread, 321 S. McCaslin Blvd, Louisville, CO, asked <br />for Council's preference on the type of sign. He stated that they would agree to the terms <br />set forth in the Resolution. <br /> <br />COUNCIL COMMENT <br /> <br />Sisk asked Principal Planner Johnstone if granting this request would set a precedent for <br />other retail merchants along McCaslin Blvd. <br /> <br />Johnstone stated each request should be considered on its own merits. He noted many <br />retail businesses have frontage along McCaslin Blvd; however, Atlanta Bread does not. <br /> <br />Sisk voiced his concern relative to a precedent set with request. He asked Staff for their <br />preference on the particular type of sign. Johnstone stated that he felt the stucco would <br />appear as an artificial architectural treatment and Staff prefers leaving the brick as a <br />background. <br /> <br />Davidson asked if the applicant had a preference on the type of sign. <br /> <br />Sheila Vessels, Co-Owner for Atlanta Bread, voiced her preference for a stucco <br />background to the sign and felt that would be consistent with the rest of the commercial <br />buildings. <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.