Laserfiche WebLink
City Council <br /> Meeting Minutes <br /> February 18, 2014 <br /> Page 8 of 23 <br /> b. Table D103.4 and Section D106 and D107 in Appendix D of the <br /> International Fire Code provide clear standards for turnarounds, <br /> maximum permissible roadway length and required secondary access for <br /> all types of developments. These standards are based on the rigorous <br /> review process by which the International Fire Code is regularly updated. <br /> c. Section 503.1.2 provides the Fire Code Official the ultimate authority to <br /> require a secondary access if it is deemed necessary by the Fire <br /> Department <br /> Sec. 15.12.120. Fire Lane Specifications: Staff recommended changes to this section <br /> because in most instances the fire code is more restrictive. <br /> PUBLIC COMMENTS <br /> Joel Hayes, 187 Harper Street, Louisville, CO urged Council to vote no on the <br /> amendments to the Louisville Municipal Code. He noted the International Fire Code is a <br /> minimum standard and does not contain any extensive requirement. He stated only two <br /> appendixes of the International Fire Code are being adopted by the ordinance. He <br /> addressed fire apparatus roads and saw no reason to delete those provisions from the <br /> Louisville Municipal Code. <br /> COUNCIL COMMENTS <br /> Council member Stolzmann explained by adopting Ordinance 1652, Series 2013, the <br /> City Council adopts the 2012 International Building Code and all the associated <br /> documents as amended, which would include the entire Fire Code. <br /> Planning Director Russ noted optional language was provided for Fire lane <br /> requirements should Council desire to maintain the secondary access requirements <br /> currently located in subsections 15.12.110. C & D of the Louisville Municipal Code. <br /> PUBLIC COMMENTS <br /> John Leary, 1116 LaFarge Avenue, Louisville, CO addressed the requirement for <br /> secondary access, which deals with all kinds of emergency access situations and stated <br /> there was no reason to delegate this type of power to the Fire Chief. He stated Council <br /> should never consider trading off safety for developer profits. He urged Council to stay <br /> with the principals, which have made Louisville what it is today. <br /> Bob Van Pelt, 842 Trail Ridge Drive, Louisville, CO, a member of the Board of Appeals, <br /> stated the Board had several meetings over the last few months on the International <br /> Building Code in which the Louisville Fire Protection District participated. He noted at <br /> the Council meetings there was a lot of discussion about density and growth, but the <br /> Board of Appeals only reviewed the Code with respect to public safety. <br />