Laserfiche WebLink
City Council <br /> Meeting Minutes <br /> February 18, 2014 <br /> Page 9 of 23 <br /> Michael Perkins, 229 Vulcan Street, Louisville, CO urged Council to not allow subjective <br /> alternatives. He supported consistency and erring on the side of safety. He felt the <br /> more conservative alternatives should be kept in place. <br /> Alexandra Bradley, 1385 Caledonia, Louisville, CO read a letter written by Paula <br /> Palmer, who resides at 1603 Cottonwood Drive, Louisville, CO, which addressed her <br /> concern over the changes to the Building and Fire Code. Ms. Bradley reminded Council <br /> of the petition she presented at the last meeting, which had 51 signatures, asking the <br /> City Council to deny the Code changes, which would decrease safety and have impacts <br /> later on. <br /> City Attorney Light reviewed the optional language for fire lane requirement, which <br /> Planning Director Russ referred to earlier as follows: If City Council wishes to maintain <br /> the secondary access requirements currently located in subsections 15.12.110, C & D <br /> of the Louisville Municipal Code (LMC). <br /> B. In addition to the requirement of Appendix D, no platted street in multifamily, <br /> industrial, business or commercial development ending in a cul-de-sac or some other <br /> design shall exceed 300 feet in length without providing a secondary fire lane access. <br /> C. In addition to the requirement of Appendix D, no platted street in a single-family area <br /> ending in a cul-de-sac or some other design shall exceed 500 feet in length without <br /> providing a secondary fire lane access. <br /> Jean Morgan, 1131 Spruce Street, Louisville, CO commented on the narrow streets <br /> proposed for new developments, which are purported to be slower and safer streets. <br /> She begged to differ and stated the streets must be wider to be safer. She noted <br /> certain conditions such as ice, children running into the street, bicyclists, drivers exiting <br /> their cars and larger vehicles such as fire and trash trucks make narrow streets more <br /> dangerous. <br /> Debbie Fahey, 1118 W. Enclave Circle, Louisville, CO concurred with the comments <br /> voiced by other residents. She wanted the standards to be ideal instead of minimum. <br /> She felt there should be a minimum street width and if a request came forward for <br /> something different, they could apply for a variance. <br /> Matt Berry, 740 Garfield Avenue, Louisville, CO, Vice-Chair Board of Appeals, <br /> addressed sprinkling systems for single-family detached homes, and felt there is a quite <br /> a difference between technical rules and effective rules. He felt the building codes are <br /> getting deeper into private structures, which may cause residents to ignore the building <br /> permit process. He felt the City should use rules in place and the building division <br /> willenforce them. He thought the requirement might extend to residential remodels. <br /> Planning Director Russ stated the Planning Division received an email from Garrett <br /> Mundelein relative to the fire sprinkling issue, which would be made part of the record. <br />