Laserfiche WebLink
<br />NONE <br /> <br />Davidson closed the public hearing and called for Council comments or motions. <br /> <br />Sisk moved that Council approve Resolution No. 25, Series 1996, a Budget amendment for the 1995 <br />open incumberances. Seconded by Lathrop. Roll call was taken. Motion passed by a 7 - 0 vote. <br /> <br />RESOLUTION NO. 26, SERIES 1996 - RESERVING PART OF THE FUND BALANCE OF <br />THE CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND FOR THE FUTURE DEVELOPMENT OF A <br />COMMUNITY PARK <br /> <br />Dianne Ray, Finance Director, stated that during the 1996 Budget process it had been determined that <br />certain amounts be set aside specifically for the development of a community park. This was done <br />through the Capital Improvements program. A schedule had been set for the next four years of <br />amounts they would like to have designated. This is for the amount of $100,000 from the 1996 <br />Budget through the Capital Project Fund. She stated that the money will not be spent until the <br />amount accumulates over several years. Council will then designate how the money will be spent. <br /> <br />Davidson stated that the Finance Committee had reviewed this and recommended its approval. <br /> <br />Howard moved that Council approve Resolution No. 26, Series 1996, designating part of the Fund <br />balance of the Capital Projects Fund for the future development of a community park. Seconded by <br />Sisk. Roll call was taken. Motion passed by a 7 - 0 vote. <br /> <br />RESOLUTION NO. 27, SERIES 1996 - APPROVING AN AMENDMENT TO A FINAL PUD <br />DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR CHENG'S GARDEN <br /> <br />Paul Wood, Planning Director, stated that this amendment was requested because upon inspection <br />of the building staff had noted a series of exterior wall fixtures that were not authorized as part of the <br />PUD. The lenses of the fixtures had been frosted to reduce the glare. They have a 13 watt <br />fluorescent bulb, which is equivalent to a 60 watt incandescent. Planning Commission approved a <br />resolution forwarding this to Council. <br /> <br />Davidson called for the applicant's presentation. <br /> <br />Steve Wells, representing Cheng's LLC, explained that he had never seen the original PUD. They had <br />a set of the Building Department drawings, which departed from the PUD drawings in that they <br />showed these lights. The discrepancy was not caught until the lights were on the building. <br /> <br />Davidson called for Council questions or comments. <br /> <br />Mayer had seen the frosted lights at night and felt they were acceptable. <br /> <br />5 <br />