Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Mayer felt the cul-de-sac was sort of blocked off from Lots 1 and 2. He wanted to make sure there <br />was enough room for the fire trucks. <br /> <br />Kreutzman assured Mayer there was more than enough room for fire trucks. The cul-de-sac was <br />created that way as a design element. <br /> <br />Mayer pointed out that they were asking for some relief on Lot 2 for sub-standard frontage on a cul- <br />de-sac. He was concerned that the homes in the drawings were being represented as to what will be <br />on the property. If so, then it would maybe have to be reflected on the PUD or in the Annexation <br />Agreement. <br /> <br />Kruetzman stated that the Planning Director had suggested he do a preliminary concept sketch and <br />some architectural renderings of the PUD. <br /> <br />Sisk asked about the open space dedication on the property. <br /> <br />Wood stated that this plan would require cash-in-lieu of payment. <br /> <br />Sisk felt that with a cash-in-lieu of payment Kruetzman would be receiving the equivalent to one lot, <br />which was an issue he wanted addressed. <br /> <br />Lathrop was concerned with the narrowing of the access road to 20', as right now it is about 30'. He <br />would not support the 20', but would at 30'. <br /> <br />Howard wanted a stipulation on the PUD or have an Annexation Agreement stating the sizes of the <br />homes proposed. He also did not want the narrow 20' road. <br /> <br />Kruetzman felt the 2,200 s.f. to 2,800 s.f. homes proposed were ideal for the neighborhood. He <br />stated that the feedback at the neighborhood meeting was positive toward the subdivision. <br /> <br />Levihn suggested going in a little farther on the cul-da-sac to give more frontage to Lot 2. <br /> <br />Davidson asked that the City Attorney look into the liability the City would have if Council approved <br />a street that was narrower than typically allowed for fire and emergency access. <br /> <br />Mayer moved that Council forward the annexation and zoning request for 601 Johnson Street on to <br />the Planning Commission with Council comments. Seconded by Sisk. All in favor. <br /> <br />RESOLUTION NO. 28, SERIES 1996 - APPROVING A FINAL PUD DEVELOPMENT <br />PLAN FOR LA QUINTA INN - CENTENNIAL VALLEY, LOT 3, PARCEL H, 2ND FILING <br /> <br />Paul Wood, Planning Director, stated that this is for a 63,325 s.f., three-story, 120 guest room La <br />Quinta Inn on 3.6 acres with a building coverage of 16% and a floor area ratio of .40. Landscaping <br /> <br />7 <br />