My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Minutes 2014 07 01
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
MINUTES (45.090)
>
2014 City Council Minutes
>
City Council Minutes 2014 07 01
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 2:44:36 PM
Creation date
7/16/2014 9:04:38 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Minutes
Original Hardcopy Storage
7D4
Supplemental fields
Test
CCMIN 2014 07 01
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
31
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
City Council <br />Meeting Minutes <br />July 1,2014 <br />Page 15 of 31 <br />use, and felt it was just more residential and would like to see more opportunities for <br />business coming into the downtown area. She addressed public dedication and did not <br />see the mews as a public land, but rather as residential use. <br />Council member Keany voiced his support of the development. He noted this is just <br />Phase 1 of a very large project with many more components. He agreed there should <br />be a joint meeting with the School District, but felt it is a School District issue. He also <br />would like to see more diversity in the architecture on Griffith Street. <br />City Attorney Light offered the following condition: <br />6. The final architectural elevations shall be revised to include additional height, <br />roofline, facade and other architectural elements variations to further the intent of <br />the MUDDSG that the development include variety in mass and scale, avoid a <br />"barrack- type" or repetitive appearance, and create the appearance of <br />development that occurred over a period of time. The focus of the revisions <br />should be to further mitigate massing /scale impact on the Little Italy <br />neighborhood. The final, revised elevations shall be submitted to and subject to <br />administrative review and approval by the Director of Planning and City Manager. <br />Mayor Muckle closed the public hearing. <br />MOTION: Council member Lipton moved to approve Resolution No. 33, Series 2014, <br />with the five conditions submitted by staff and changing Condition # 3 to read the <br />applicant "should" submit a Public Art Master Plan in Phase 2, instead of "shall ", and <br />add Condition #6 as outlined by the City Attorney, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Dalton. <br />Planning and Building Safety Director Russ suggested adding materials to the condition <br />as follows: "to further the intent of the MUDDSG that the development include variety in <br />mass, scale and "materials ". Council member Lipton and Mayor Pro Tem Dalton <br />accepted the amendment. <br />VOTE: All were in favor. Absent: Council member Loo. <br />RESOLUTION No. 34, SERIES 2014 — A RESOLUTION APPROVING A CORE <br />PROJECT AREA AGREEMENT AND AMENDING TERM SHEET FOR THE <br />HIGHWAY 42 CORE PROJECT AREA. <br />Mayor Muckle requested a staff presentation. <br />Economic Development Director DeJong presented the Core Area Infrastructure <br />Agreement for the Highway 42 Project area. The Agreement outlines Louisville <br />Revitalization Commission's (LRC) intent to issue a $4,500,000 Tax Increment <br />Financing (TIF) bond to pay for infrastructure costs within the Core Project Area of the <br />Urban Renewal Area. The scope of work includes new streets, underground utilities, <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.