City Council Minutes 2014 07 01 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

City Council Meeting Minutes July 1,2014 Page 14 of 31 City Attorney Light requested he be allowed to enter documents into the record before the closure of the public hearing. Council member Lipton withdrew his motion and Mayor Pro Tem Daltons withdrew his second to the motion. PUBLIC COMMENTS Alex Bradley, 1385 Caledonia, Louisville, CO noted the LES enrollment from this development, with the total density of 193 or 191 will put LES close to capacity. City Attorney Light asked City Council to adopt a motion to include in the record for this Proceeding the following documents: All application materials submitted by the applicant; in connection to the application all the City Council packet, consisting of the City staff communications and all attachments; the PowerPoint presentations made by Planning staff and the applicant; all written referrals and public comments received regarding this application; the City's Comprehensive Plan, the City's Subdivision and Zoning ordinances set forth in Title 16 and 17; the Mixed Use Development Standards and Guidelines; the Commercial Development Guidelines; a June 11, 2014 email from Ms. Bradley regarding the projection detention facilities and the June 17, 2014 letter from Ms. Bradley with the attachments regarding school enrollment. The applicant had no objection to the documents inclusion into the record. MOTION: Council member Keany moved to include in the record all the documents as outlined by the City Attorney, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Dalton. All were in favor. Absent: Council member Loo. COUNCIL COMMENTS Council member Muckle voiced his support of the language offered by Council member Lipton and noted City Attorney Light will provide additional language. He supported the project, which will serve the downtown area and provide many benefits. He was sympathetic to the issue of school enrollment, but stated the School District will have to resolve the problem, but was willing to work with the them. He supported a variety of architecture opposed to the repetitive architecture proposed. Council member Stolzmann stated it is difficult to apply the design guidelines with this phase. She looked forward to the second phase of the development and hoped the design would not be repetitive. With respect to the transit oriented development, she felt it was dishonest and should be addressed in the guidelines. She stressed the importance of a joint meeting with the School District to ask them to redistrict. Council member Moss agreed with Council member Stolzmann relative to the City Council meeting with the School Board. She agreed there is room in Louisville schools, but everything is funneled through LES. She also agreed with comments on the mixed-