City Council Minutes 1996 08 20 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Lathrop was concerned about the increased traffic and felt more landscaping was needed. He looked favorably on the project otherwise. Keany did not want trees planted that would block views. He wanted the parking lot lighting kept low to the ground and low in wattage. He agreed with Council's other concerns. Levihn agreed with Council's above mentioned concerns, particularly the neighborhood meeting. Davidson suggested that the parking lot lights be turned off at a certain time. Mayer moved that Council refer the Neodata PUD to Planning Commission with Council comments. Seconded by Keany. All in favor. DISCUSSION/DIRECTION - PACIFICA CENTENNIAL PHASE II - FINAL PUD DEVELOPMENT PLAN Paul Wood, Planning Commission, stated that the applicants proposed to build a 72,000 s.f, three- story office building in Centennial Valley Business Park, Lot 2, with a landscape coverage of38.8%. The proposed height was 43' exceeding the maximum of35' per the CVB Park Design Guidelines. Tim Gudim, Pacifica Holding Company, 5350 So. Roslyn Street, Suite 240, Englewood, Colorado 80111, spoke of his enthusiasm for the project. Ken Harshman, M+o+A Architectural Partnership, 1660 - 17th Street, Suite 200, Denver, Colorado 80202, reviewed the site plan. Davidson called for Council comments or questions. Lathrop liked project. Howard was not in favor of the building height variance. Keany liked the design of the three-story building. Mayer was concerned about the building being three stories. Keany wanted some computer imaging from McCaslin as to what the building would look like. Davidson liked the project. He pointed out that it breaks up the style of buildings in that area and would be architecturally pleasing. He was not concerned about the size of the building. He wanted the height limit as far as the CVBPDGs solved before Council saw this project for final review. Harshman stated that there is an architectural control committee for CVBP. 5