Laserfiche WebLink
<br />discussed. <br />Applicant Summary: <br /> <br />Erik Hartronft referred to the pro and con discussion of Alternative A and B and that Alternative <br />B has a lot of drawbacks that are acknowlegded by Staff which the applicant agrees with. <br />Alternative A is the better solution from an architectural aesthetic standpoint. Mr. Hartronft feels <br />that a two-story version of this building also has a lot of drawbacks. <br /> <br />Public Hearing Closed/Comments from Commissioners: <br /> <br />Chairman Boulet is concerned about voting for a 29-foot height limit without knowing what it <br />will do to the rest of the site plan. <br /> <br />Commissioner Pritchard is against the 29-foot height limitation because it reduces the amount of <br />variety downtown. <br /> <br /> <br />?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? <br /> <br /> <br />Roll Call Vote: <br /> Chris Pritchard, Yes; Sarah Klahn, Yes; Russ Van Nostrand, Yes; Robert <br />McAllister, No; Bill Boulet, No. Motion passes 4:1. <br /> <br />F. Resolution No. 6, Series 1999, Lot 3, Centennial Valley, Parcel L, Filing No. <br />1, Amoco Corporation, Preliminary PUD Development Plan and Special <br />Review Use for a gas station, car wash and oil change facility. <br /> <br /> <br />Staff Certification/Planning Commission Disclosures: <br /> <br />Ken Johnstone stated that this Public Hearing was continued from the January 12, 1999, at the <br />applicant’s request and that notice was re-published in the Daily Camera on January 23, 1999, and <br />mailed to surrounding property owners on January 22, 1999. The second notice was required to <br />advertise for this as a Special Review Use in addition to the PUD. All Planning Commissioners <br />verified that they were familiar with the site. <br /> <br />Staff Report: <br /> <br />Ken Johnstone stated that this is a request for a Preliminary PUD approval and also for <br />consideration of the Special Review Use for a gas station, car wash and Grease Monkey. Mr. <br />Johnstone stated that there would be no final action taken on the Special Review Use at this time, <br />it would only be comments. Mr. Johnstone presented the details of this matter as stated in the <br />staff report. Mr. Johnstone stated that Staff is recommending approval with a number of <br />conditions on the Preliminary PUD. <br /> <br /> 7 <br /> <br />