My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Planning Commission Minutes 1999 07 01
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
PLANNING COMMISSION
>
1994-1999 Planning Commission
>
1999 Planning Commission Minutes
>
Planning Commission Minutes 1999 07 01
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 9:55:13 AM
Creation date
9/5/2014 3:12:25 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
Supplemental fields
Test
PCMIN 1999 07 01
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br />Mr. Campoto would like to preserve the “Open 24 Hours” sign and the bank sign. Chairman <br />Boulet explained that the CDDSG prohibits such signs. Mr. Campoto asked that the sign code be <br />grandfathered as this is the existing signage for Safeway. <br /> <br />Commissioner Lipton would like to see that the landscaping be brought-up to the Design <br />Guidelines Standards of 30% and that it could be a combination of landscaping or pedestrian <br />areas. Lipton would also like to see the east elevation dealt with somehow. <br /> <br />Staff Summary: <br /> <br />Paul Wood stated that Resolution No. 12, Series 1999, comes before the Commission with 3 <br />Conditions of approval. Staff does not object to removing the brick pilaster elements on the <br />horizontal fascia element as they are in two different planes on the development. <br /> <br />Applicant Summary: <br /> <br />Nothing further. <br /> <br />Public Hearing Closed / Commission Discussion / Vote: <br /> <br />Jeff Lipton would be amenable to volunteering a continuance to next month’s meeting and asking <br />the applicant to come back with a plan that meets the design guidelines on the landscape coverage <br />and/or pedestrian gathering places. Lipton would also like to see some kind of architectural <br />treatment on the east elevation. If the applicant came back met those two conditions, he would be <br />flexible on the signage. <br /> <br />All Commissioners agreed that the new guidelines need to be complied with. However, there <br />should be some give and take for existing buildings. <br /> <br />Chairman Boulet encouraged the Staff to work with the applicant to come to a reasonable balance <br />of the needs and requirements and then to bring that proposal forward. <br /> <br />Motion made by Jeffrey Lipton to continue Resolution No. 12, Series 1999, to the March 9, <br />1999, Planning Commission meeting with the direction to Staff to continue to work with the <br />applicant to see if they could bring the proposal closer to the requirements in the Design <br />Guidelines and to address the other issues identified. Seconded by Bill Boulet. <br /> <br />Unanimous Voice Vote to continue. <br /> <br /> <br />F.Resolution No. 13, Series 1999, Lots 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6, Block 7, Business Center <br />at CTC, Preliminary PUD Development Plan and Subdivision Replat for <br />speculative industrial, office, warehouse, and R&D space in three buildings <br /> <br /> 5 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.