Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Approved – September 18, 2003 <br />Lipton briefly reviewed the applications for the May 13, 2003 meeting. He asked why the Public <br />Safety Building was coming back to the Planning Commission when they had already approved <br />the final PUD. <br /> <br />Paul Wood, Director of Planning, stated that the architect had changed, enough changes were <br />made to the exterior of the building and it had not been before City Council so it was necessary to <br />bring it back to the Planning Commission. <br /> <br /> <br />7.Staff Comments <br /> <br />Staff discussed the following: 1) South Subarea Comprehensive Plan update, 2) a City-wide <br />Comprehensive Plan, 3) HWY 42 Framework Plan. <br /> <br />Staff referenced the Memorandum that was included in the meeting packet to lead the discussion <br />of the Comprehensive Plan (South Subarea and City-wide Comp. Plan and HWY 42). <br /> <br />Several Commissioners expressed concerns that perhaps the City Council is not interested in <br />doing a citywide comprehensive plan. Wood replied that the support for a citywide plan would <br />not come at the expense of other priorities. <br /> <br />Lipton suggested that the Commissioners respond formally to the City Council regarding their <br />concerns they have expressed this evening. Robson stated he would draft a letter to the Council; <br />send it via email to Kalish and McDermott for editing, then to the Commissioners for final <br />approval before sending to City Council members. <br /> <br />Johnstone reported that the HWY 42 Framework Plan is in the finalization process. A public <br />meeting is scheduled for May 1, 2003 to present the final plan. It is also possible that it will be an <br />agenda item for the May 13 Planning Commission meeting. <br /> <br />Lipton suggested that with the number of items and the detail that is anticipated for some of the <br />items that the Commission might need to hold an overflow meeting during May. The meeting <br />would be held on May 22, if necessary. <br /> <br /> <br />8.Planning Commission Comments <br /> <br />McAvinew discussed the use of the term “Kentucky Bluegrass” in the revised CDDSG Landscape <br />proposal. <br /> <br />Lipton requested that staff review the PUD plans for the church located on Via Appia. He <br />believes some key elements of the landscape and site plan are missing. <br /> <br /> <br />9.Adjournment <br /> <br />Lipton called a motion to adjourn. So moved by McDermott. Seconded by Kalish. <br />Lipton adjourned the meeting at 9:00 pm. <br /> <br />14 <br />