Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Approved – September 18, 2003 <br />Reis discussed the voting process by the HOA members. He explained that it was a vote by mail <br />to 101 members. The final vote count was 53 in favor and 17 against and 30 ballots not returned <br />and 1 not permitted to vote as they are in arrears. 75% of the voters voted in favor of the <br />change. <br /> <br />Commission Questions: <br />McDermott asked of those owners affected by the change who voted for and against the proposal. <br />Reis replied that all voting is done with a blind ballot for HOA business. <br /> <br />McDermott asked if there is a square foot limit to the size of the arbor. <br />Reis stated that the size will be limited by the size of the lot that is remaining that has the potential <br />for use as an arbor in the back yards. <br /> <br />Lipton stated that the PUD should specify the amount of lawn to be preserved. <br />Martell stated that as currently proposed the setback will control the amount of lawn to be <br />preserved. <br /> <br />Kalish requested a clarification on the definition for arbor and what will prevent the homeowner <br />from closing in the roof. <br />Reis stated that the HOA will control the closing in of the roof via the PUD notes and through the <br />design guidelines that been developed by the Arbor Committee. <br /> <br />Lipton requested that the wording on note #3 for the PUD be changed and to make this effective <br />for the entire subdivision and not just a specific list of lots. <br /> <br />McAvinew agreed that the specific lots need some clarification. <br /> <br />Robson asked about amending the PUD to allow all lots to be affected by this change. <br /> <br />Martell stated that Staff would have a difficult time supporting that change since that is not what <br />the applicant requested. Staff would request that the applicant address that with the HOA before <br />making the recommendation. <br /> <br />Members of the Public: <br />Wilton Hodges, 743 Pear Court, Louisville supports the amendment as presented by Michael <br />Reis. He would want Michael to take this back to the HOA if the Planning Commission wants to <br />make any changes to the request. <br /> <br />Staff Summary and Recommendation: <br />Staff had no additional comments. <br /> <br />Applicant Summary: <br />Applicant had no additional comments. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />8 <br /> <br />