Laserfiche WebLink
City Council <br />Meeting Minutes <br />October 21, 2014 <br />Page 7 of 24 <br />Mayor Muckle stated Council had made suggestions on the individual departments' <br />performance measures and goals at the last meeting. He inquired whether there are <br />responses to those suggestions. City Manager Fleming stated all of the changes to the <br />performance measures and the departmental detail will be incorporated into the packet <br />material for the November 3 meeting. <br />PUBLIC COMMENTS <br />Cory Nickerson, 2351 Senator Court, Louisville, CO voiced her concern over cutting the <br />Nite at the Rec. She suggested Council increase the price or limit the season. She <br />stressed the Nite at the Rec makes Louisville's families feel safe. She also suggested <br />raising the rates for non - residents. <br />Chuck Donnelly, 2366 Senator Court, Louisville, CO addressed the transfers from <br />Waste Water Fund to the capital improvement fund and stated his understanding the <br />City's water rates will be increasing by 40 %. He asked if there were any other <br />assumptions or increases in fees or taxes built in it. He asked if there was a rule of <br />thumb for the transfer of funds such as general funds to capital improvement funds. <br />John Leary, 1116 LaFarge Avenue, Louisville, CO thanked Council for bringing the <br />goals and objectives into the budget, but felt there was still work to be done. He felt the <br />goals and objectives should be driving the process. He commented on the fund based <br />budgeting and felt there was no transparency and he saw no sense in going in that <br />direction. Budgeting should be by revenue source, by fees and taxes designated for <br />particular items. Fees should not be taken into the general fund and lost. Each program <br />should list their source of funds. He addressed the building permit program and stated it <br />should be a cash sustaining program. There should be evidence of the cost of the <br />program, the revenue derived by the program and a way to track the money. He <br />addressed the fees waived for new business and when he asked who pays for those <br />fees was told the General Fund. He voiced his belief it came from taxes. He stated <br />fund accounting should be much more explicit on revenue derived from development. <br />He stated there cannot be an ongoing loan from the Waste Water Utility Fund to the golf <br />course. The initial loan switched the bond payment because there was a significant <br />balance in the fund and the planned future capital projects could pay off the loan without <br />interfering with the function of the fund. He stated his understanding that an Enterprise <br />Fund could not be used for an unrelated purpose and the shortfall has to be paid out of <br />the General Fund. He thanked the Council for budget improvements. <br />COUNCIL COMMENTS <br />Council member Loo had suggestions for cutting the budget. She addressed personnel <br />and stressed this is not the time to hire new employees. She felt there is much <br />uncertainty in the economy in the coming years and did not want to bring on new <br />employees only to let them go. She supported the Maintenance Tech III, the Building <br />