Laserfiche WebLink
City Council <br />Meeting Minutes <br />October 21, 2014 <br />Page 8 of 24 <br />Inspection and Administration support. She supported the Night at the Rec Program and <br />hiring the rangers sometime in the future. She did not support the Communications <br />Audit or the Parking Permit Study. <br />Council member Lipton thanked City Manager Fleming for bringing a more modest <br />budget request and offering some interesting ideas for reductions. He was comfortable <br />with the fund balance reserve. <br />Council member Keany voiced his surprise the Nite at the Rec was a suggested <br />deletion and voiced his opposition to cutting the program. He suggested adding one <br />ranger, deleting one part -time ranger and leaving in the Nite at the Rec. He did not see <br />any need for additional cuts because of the revenue projections. He suggested a study <br />session on the Parks and Open Space Fund and discussion on how the funds are used <br />and how staff is directed to manage the fund in the future. <br />Mayor Muckle agreed with Council members Lipton and Keany and was satisfied with <br />the fund reserves proposed by the City Manager. He supported the Nite at the Rec <br />Program and the Sculpture Garden staying in 2015. He noted the Cultural Council <br />raised money and the City is being asked to provide a matching amount. He stated <br />staff is making progress on the goals and performance measures. He agreed Council <br />will have to discuss how the Open Space and Parks Fund is used. <br />Council member Stolzmann voiced her appreciation to City Manager Fleming for his <br />responses to her questions. She did not support deleting the Nite at the Rec. She <br />stated it is supported by many Louisville families and agreed the program should break <br />even again. She agreed there is much economic uncertainty and supported taking a <br />conservative approach. She addressed the CIP Projects and stated there were many <br />factors which required large transfers from the General Fund. She was in favor of the <br />budget cuts, a conservative budget and waiting until mid -year to make some decisions <br />on the workload. She supported the reduction in the Communications Audit and agreed <br />the Council should revisit the uses of the Open Space and Parks Fund. She hoped the <br />Water Committee would revisit charging the City for water and how the parks are <br />charged and form a policy. She did not support moving the paving out, but supported re- <br />allocating which streets should be paved. <br />Mayor Muckle responded to Mr. Leary's question relative to spending one -time revenue <br />on one -time projects. He stressed it is the City intent to spend one -time revenues on <br />one -time projects. <br />City Manager Fleming responded to Mr. Donnelly's two questions relative to the use of <br />Waste Water Utility Funds and any proposed increases in water fees and the policy for <br />transfers from the General Fund to the Capital Projects Fund. He explained the budget <br />does not assume fee or tax increases in any area except for the Water and Waste <br />Water rates. Those fee increases reflect the conclusion of the Water Rate Study and <br />on -going attempts to pinpoint the construction costs for the Waste Water Plant <br />