My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Minutes 2014 10 21
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
MINUTES (45.090)
>
2014 City Council Minutes
>
City Council Minutes 2014 10 21
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 2:44:36 PM
Creation date
11/4/2014 7:50:15 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Minutes
Original Hardcopy Storage
7D4
Supplemental fields
Test
CCMIN 2014 10 21
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
24
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
City Council <br />Meeting Minutes <br />October 21, 2014 <br />Page 8 of 24 <br />Inspection and Administration support. She supported the Night at the Rec Program and <br />hiring the rangers sometime in the future. She did not support the Communications <br />Audit or the Parking Permit Study. <br />Council member Lipton thanked City Manager Fleming for bringing a more modest <br />budget request and offering some interesting ideas for reductions. He was comfortable <br />with the fund balance reserve. <br />Council member Keany voiced his surprise the Nite at the Rec was a suggested <br />deletion and voiced his opposition to cutting the program. He suggested adding one <br />ranger, deleting one part -time ranger and leaving in the Nite at the Rec. He did not see <br />any need for additional cuts because of the revenue projections. He suggested a study <br />session on the Parks and Open Space Fund and discussion on how the funds are used <br />and how staff is directed to manage the fund in the future. <br />Mayor Muckle agreed with Council members Lipton and Keany and was satisfied with <br />the fund reserves proposed by the City Manager. He supported the Nite at the Rec <br />Program and the Sculpture Garden staying in 2015. He noted the Cultural Council <br />raised money and the City is being asked to provide a matching amount. He stated <br />staff is making progress on the goals and performance measures. He agreed Council <br />will have to discuss how the Open Space and Parks Fund is used. <br />Council member Stolzmann voiced her appreciation to City Manager Fleming for his <br />responses to her questions. She did not support deleting the Nite at the Rec. She <br />stated it is supported by many Louisville families and agreed the program should break <br />even again. She agreed there is much economic uncertainty and supported taking a <br />conservative approach. She addressed the CIP Projects and stated there were many <br />factors which required large transfers from the General Fund. She was in favor of the <br />budget cuts, a conservative budget and waiting until mid -year to make some decisions <br />on the workload. She supported the reduction in the Communications Audit and agreed <br />the Council should revisit the uses of the Open Space and Parks Fund. She hoped the <br />Water Committee would revisit charging the City for water and how the parks are <br />charged and form a policy. She did not support moving the paving out, but supported re- <br />allocating which streets should be paved. <br />Mayor Muckle responded to Mr. Leary's question relative to spending one -time revenue <br />on one -time projects. He stressed it is the City intent to spend one -time revenues on <br />one -time projects. <br />City Manager Fleming responded to Mr. Donnelly's two questions relative to the use of <br />Waste Water Utility Funds and any proposed increases in water fees and the policy for <br />transfers from the General Fund to the Capital Projects Fund. He explained the budget <br />does not assume fee or tax increases in any area except for the Water and Waste <br />Water rates. Those fee increases reflect the conclusion of the Water Rate Study and <br />on -going attempts to pinpoint the construction costs for the Waste Water Plant <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.