Laserfiche WebLink
City Council <br />Meeting Minutes <br />November 18, 2014 <br />Page 5 of 16 <br />Council member Keany inquired how much the bridge's smaller opening contributed to <br />the spread and whether there would still be a spread with a larger opening. Mr. <br />Nemovitz explained the spread helped a little. He noted they will try to open up the <br />channel. <br />Public Works Director Kowar noted the railroad is the controlling factor as it backs up <br />everything. Even if water is getting through at the County Road /95th Street Bridge <br />opening, it will still pool and back up at the railroad. <br />Mr. Nemovitz reviewed the options for the proposed bridge replacement through a <br />series of slides. The proposed bridge design requires a 70 foot wide opening. This <br />opening, driven by calculations to handle 100 -year floodway flows, will also be wide <br />enough to accommodate a future pedestrian path. The proposed bridge design will <br />provide at a minimum two 11 foot vehicle travel lanes and a 4 -foot shoulder on either <br />side. The bridge design could also accommodate wider 8 -foot shoulders. In considering <br />the shoulder width, the team discussed safety for traffic, pedestrians and bicyclists. The <br />team decided a 4 -foot shoulder would be a better fit for the site. The decision points for <br />the City Council are the Bridge /Roadway Shoulder Widths of 4 -feet (recommended) or <br />8 -feet. <br />COUNCIL COMMENTS <br />Council member Loo addressed the 8 -foot shoulders and noted the rest of the road <br />does not have 8 -foot shoulders. She asked if the 8 -foot shoulders would only be for the <br />length of the bridge. Public Works Director Kowar stated the 8 -foot shoulders would <br />anticipate carrying to Bella Vista, but not south to 96th Street. <br />Council member Loo did not recall any long -term plans to widen the roadway. Public <br />Works Director Kowar stated it would be a large project to widen the roadway to 96th <br />Street and is not in any long -range plans. <br />Council member Loo stated she was not a bicyclist, but inquired whether there is a <br />benefit to having a larger bike lane. Mr. Nemovitz clarified the 8 -foot shoulder would be <br />for the full length of the bridge, but does not include Bella Vista to 96th Street. He felt <br />there was a safety benefit. He explained the vision was not for a trail or recreational <br />pathway, but for a safe roadway. <br />Council member Loo asked if there was an emergency, could a car pull over on the 8- <br />foot shoulder. Mr. Nemovitz confirmed a 4 -foot or 8 -foot shoulder could be used in <br />case of emergency. He clarified for the length of the bridge project there will be a guard <br />rail on both sides of the road. <br />Council member Loo inquired whether there are a lot of people who pull over in that <br />stretch of the road. Public Works Director Kowar did not believe the shoulders are used <br />very often for emergency purposes. <br />