My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Minutes 1990 02 06
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
MINUTES (45.090)
>
1970-1999 City Council Minutes
>
1990 City Council Minutes
>
City Council Minutes 1990 02 06
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 2:31:31 PM
Creation date
2/18/2008 1:07:54 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Minutes
Signed Date
2/6/1990
Original Hardcopy Storage
2E2
Supplemental fields
Test
CCMIN 1990 02 06
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
48
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
It was the MTDC proposal and we discussed <br />airport access." <br />Mayor Fauson stated, "I have no problem <br />with the first resolution except the second <br />part. I would like to see that redrafted <br />stating that we have nothing to hide from <br />the citizens of this city. That we would <br />like to be straight forward with the <br />people. We will always abide by state <br />statutes." <br />Williams was asked by Carnival if the <br />second paragraph of this resolution just <br />clarifies the ordinance that is in place <br />right now as far as open government? <br />Williams stated that he feels it adds to <br />it. It just takes a stronger stand that <br />this council is committed to that. <br />Carnival then said, "If that is the case, <br />then I would go along with Mr . Sackett that <br />we sit down and draft it more appropriately <br />than just a single councilman dealing with <br />a resolution. I'm sure that she has ever <br />right to do it, but I think it should be <br />something that we should look at (the <br />existing ordinance), and if it needs to be <br />clarified by a second paragraph such as <br />the one that's presented here tonight, I'm <br />all in favor of it. But not at tonight's <br />meeting." <br />Carnival motioned to remain in the segment. <br />Can we have Roll Call please . By Roll Call <br />Vote the motion passed 4-2. <br />W-470 PUBLIC HEARING Mayor Havorka, Westminster, explained why <br />they have remained a member in the W-470 <br />Authority. One is that they have a very <br />strong feeling of the regionalism that is <br />necessary for the Metro area of Denver. <br />They are members of the Authority although <br />Westminster does not stand to gain any <br />direct benefit from annexations nor any <br />commercial development from the airport. <br />They feel that the airport was a very <br />important development to the Denver area, <br />henK~e they have continued to be members of <br />the Authority. <br />8 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.