My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Minutes 1990 10 02
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
MINUTES (45.090)
>
1970-1999 City Council Minutes
>
1990 City Council Minutes
>
City Council Minutes 1990 10 02
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 2:31:32 PM
Creation date
2/18/2008 1:40:21 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Minutes
Signed Date
10/2/1990
Original Hardcopy Storage
2E2
Supplemental fields
Test
CCMIN 1990 10 02
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Davidson: <br />Carnival: <br />Szymanski: <br />Did not feel that there was fair representation <br />from the Wards. I think that within Ward 3 it <br />would not be difficult to come up a second person. <br />Most of the task force that we would put together, <br />I would hope, in Ward 1, 2 or 3, would represent <br />what is beast for the city. With the additional <br />applicant that we had tonight we have nine people <br />and if each. of us appointed one there would be two <br />people left out. Why couldn't we just appoint the <br />nine peoples that submitted applications. <br />I do not feel that we should accept the <br />application that we received tonight. <br />Mayor Fauson: Concurred with Carnival. I feel that these <br />applicants have the city at heart and I feel they <br />would all d.o a good job. <br />Mayor Fauson moved to appi:ove the applicants that we do have and <br />have the representatives from Ward 3 (Sackett and Davidson) try <br />to find someone else that might be interested, seconded by <br />Davidson. <br />Discussion: <br />Carnival: Since we ar-e not going with our cut off date then <br />what happens to the gentlemen that applied this <br />evening? I would be in favor of that motion if we <br />would accept this individual. <br />Howard: This is an advisory group and generally they try <br />to work together and will give a view of the <br />group. I believe it is difficult for a group of <br />people to not look out for their area. I feel <br />that each of the Wards should have equal <br />representation. <br />Brand: Felt that all of the applicants would be working <br />for the good of the city. <br />After a lengthy discussion Mayor Fauson withdrew his motion and <br />Davidson withdrew his second. <br />Mayor Fauson restated his mation, we go ahead and advertise one <br />more time and have a cut off date and stick to our original plan <br />with equal representation and the applicants that we do have be <br />considered along with the late applicant, seconded by Davidson. <br />Motion passed. <br />EMPLOYEE RECOGNITION - GAIL LUCAS - PUBLIC WORKS <br />Phare: Approximately three years ago the city was faced <br />3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.