My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Minutes 1995 09 05
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
MINUTES (45.090)
>
1970-1999 City Council Minutes
>
1995 City Council Minutes
>
City Council Minutes 1995 09 05
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 2:36:40 PM
Creation date
4/20/2004 9:25:49 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Minutes
Signed Date
9/5/1995
Original Hardcopy Storage
2E4
Supplemental fields
Test
CCMIN 1995 09 05
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Keany asked for clarification that this ordinance would be based it on actual valuation, not on the <br />building standards. <br /> <br />Talboom stated that the Municipal Code now reads that the Building Official determines valuation, <br />so he asks for actual valuation compared to building standards, except for the residential construction. <br />He wanted to see the specific square footage taken out, have that same verbiage apply to everything, <br />and receive direction from Council as to whether Council wanted him to ask for actual or just figure <br />every thing at the $63.00/s.f. <br /> <br />Davidson called for public comments. <br /> <br />Ron Woelfel, 520 Orchard Drive, Louisville, Colorado, a local builder, stated that today he had paid <br />in Louisville $25,525.63 in building permit fees on a home he will be building. He is building the <br />same home on a comparable lot in Broomfield and the total building permit fee cost is less than <br />$12,000 for everything. He stated that housing costs in Louisville are going up higher than Boulder, <br />Lafayette, Broomfield, etc. He commented that Louisville's building costs are the highest in the <br />Boulder County. He built a similar house in Boulder in 1992 and the permit fees were less than <br />$13,000 for everything. He stated that using just an average number to go by was not realistic. He <br />suggested Council put this on hold and do more research, because of the impact. <br /> <br />Ray J. Schlott, 647 Manorwood Lane, Louisville, Colorado, suggested that they use the Uniform <br />Building Code for their calculation. He felt the wording in the first paragraph on page two should <br />be revised. He stated that other costs had gone up such as sewer costs and water connection costs. <br /> <br />Jim Sheffield, 6777 Wadsworth, Arvada, Colorado, urged Council to exercise caution, judgement, <br />and balance in considering these fees as a whole. <br /> <br />Davidson clarified that the residential use tax is Louisville's version of a school impact fee. The <br />money does not go to the City. It goes to the School District. Concerning comparing Louisville's <br />total building fees with Broomfield's, Broomfield chooses to use property tax and bond issues to pay <br />for things that Louisville does through impact fees. Broomfield's fees may be lower, but the resident <br />ends up paying more in the long run due to the increased property tax. <br /> <br />Sisk advocated that Council look at the Building Standard's table of modifications, using the average <br />costs. <br /> <br />Davidson asked the City Attorney to check on the specific language. <br /> <br />Keany pointed out that this also affects the permit fee and plan check fee by $400, $700, or $1,400. <br />It does not affect just the use tax. <br /> <br />Mayer pointed out Louisville has the highest fees in Boulder County, but Louisville also has the <br />lowest property taxes, with the exclusion of Ward. <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.