My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Minutes 1995 10 17
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
MINUTES (45.090)
>
1970-1999 City Council Minutes
>
1995 City Council Minutes
>
City Council Minutes 1995 10 17
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 2:36:40 PM
Creation date
4/20/2004 10:09:22 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Minutes
Signed Date
10/17/1995
Original Hardcopy Storage
2E4
Supplemental fields
Test
CCMIN 1995 10 17
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Lathrop amended his motion to change the zoning designation from RR-R to SF-R. Seconder, <br />Howard, accepted that. <br /> <br />Davidson moved to amend Lathrop's motion to zone 6.1 acres south of South Boulder Road between <br />80th Street and McCaslin Boulevard and the. 1 acre between west of McCaslin Boulevard and south <br />of 80th Street as RR-R. Seconded by Sisk. Roll call was taken on the amendment. Motion passed <br />by a 4 - 3 vote with Howard, Lathrop, and Levihn voting against. <br /> <br />Davidson called for a roll call on the original amended Ordinance No. 1166. To clarify, Davidson <br />stated that Council was now voting on Ordinance No. 1166 with his amendment and all of the <br />amendments that Lathrop originally added. Motion passed by a 7 - 0 vote. <br /> <br />Davidson told the applicant that his amendment did not imply in any way that he would not <br />necessarily vote for a PUD that would allow two homes on that land. <br /> <br />ANNEXATION AGREEMENT AND ADDENDUM (tabled from prior discussion) <br /> <br />Sisk moved that Council bring this back for discussion now, that Ordinances No. 1165 and 1166 had <br />been approved including all of the restrictions from Lathrop on the annexation and on the zon. ing. <br />He added another restriction that if the PUD is approved, the restrictive language on the deeds to the <br />properties located west of McCaslin would be included on any deeds conveying those properties. <br />Seconded by Howard. <br /> <br />Levihn wanted to make sure the applicant understood how the previous amendment affects this now. <br /> <br />Barry Morris and Mr. Ostrander, his attorney, thought it was okay with them. <br /> <br />Susan Gfiffiths, City Attomey, stated that Mr. Ostrander had suggested a revision to the Agreement <br />regarding the time of how long the water rights would be held in escrow. She suggested that the <br />language in paragraph No. 6, first sentence be changed to "All water rights listed on Exhibit C to the <br />Annexation Agreement shall be held in escrow by a person or entity approved by the Owner and the <br />City until approval of the final PUD and the time for any referendum of the PUD has lapsed or any <br />referendum has failed, at which time the water rights shall be transferred to the City .... ". <br /> <br />Sisk and Howard, seconder, accepted that. Roll call was taken. Motion passed by a 7 - 0 vote. <br /> <br />BREAK <br /> <br />Davidson called for a five minute break. <br /> <br />Council returned from break. <br /> <br />10 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.