Laserfiche WebLink
Franklin explained that there were certain <br />items related to this alley vacation that have <br />been pending for several months and recommended <br />that Council vote to deny the granting of this <br />ordinance. If the applicant can provide the <br />necessary information at a later date, another <br />ordinance will at that time be introduced. <br />Mayor Fauson opened the public hearing and <br />asked if anyone was present who wished to <br />speak to this Ordinance. There was no one <br />wishing to speak and the Mayor closed the <br />public hearing. <br />Mayor Fauson called for a motion. <br />Sackett moved and Scarpella seconded to deny <br />Ordinance #998, Series 1989. By Roll Call Vote, <br />the motion carried 7-0. <br />ORDINANCE #1015, SERIES 1989 - AMENDMENTS TO LOUISVILLE MUNICIPAL CODE - <br />2ND READING, <br />PUBLIC HEARING Read by title only, Ordinance #1015, Series <br />1989, "An Ordinance amending Titles 1 and 2 of <br />the Louisville Municipal Code." Proof of <br />publication and notice of public hearing were <br />certified by the City Clerk. <br />Stahl explained that this Ordinance was drafted <br />to clarify certain items in Chapters 1 and 2 of <br />the Louisville Municipal Code. Subsequent to <br />the original submittal to Council, there were <br />public comments regarding whether or not the <br />amended Ordinance was in fact clear with <br />respect to the appointments and terms for the <br />Judge, Attorney and Planning Commission <br />members. Staff tried to clarify certain of <br />these points and discussed with Council members <br />and Council-elect these issues. Stahl stated <br />that it has become apparent that it appears the <br />Ordinance will probably not "come to closure as <br />it is presented" and recommends that the new <br />Council deal with the issues after they take <br />office. Staff recommends Ordinance #1015 be <br />tabled until January 16, 1990. <br />Mayor Fauson opened the public hearing and <br />concurred with Stahl's recommendation. <br />Dominic DeSantis, 1045 Front Street, asked to <br />speak to the issue stating that it is his <br />opinion that certain amendments contained <br />within this Ordinance are unacceptable. Mr. <br />DeSantis reviewed amendments he felt were <br />3 <br />