|
SUBJECT:
<br />DATE:
<br />PROPOSED 2016 BUDGET AND 2016 -2020 CIP
<br />OCTOBER 26, 2015
<br />PAGE 2OF10
<br />5,000,000 -
<br />4,500,000
<br />4,000,000
<br />3,500,000
<br />3,000,000
<br />2,500,000
<br />2,000,000
<br />1,500,000
<br />1,000,000
<br />500,000
<br />Paving Expenditures (not including Utility Replacement)
<br />and Paving % of Total Capital Project Fund Expenditures
<br />00
<br />ON O 0 Off` Oh OHO O 00 10 ?$' Ni‘ '� N'b Nb` � t■6 ^ NO NO do
<br />,y0 ,LO 1O 19. ,�O ,LO ,LO rP �O ,y0 ,y0 19' �O �O ,LO `P
<br />90%
<br />80%
<br />— Total Paving
<br />70% Expenditures
<br />60%
<br />— Paving % of
<br />50% Total Capital
<br />Projects $
<br />40%
<br />30%
<br />20%
<br />10%
<br />0%
<br />The next graph shows how paving and related utility work, which should be done prior
<br />to resurfacing streets, has and will continue to more than triple over previous levels.
<br />7,000,000 -
<br />6,000,000
<br />5,000,000
<br />4,000,000
<br />3,000,000
<br />2,000,000
<br />1,000,000
<br />Paving and Related Utility Replacement Expenditures
<br />o'` o`O o'\ o�' o°' ,.° �.� �ti �3 �.�` ��' ^o �1 �.�' ,.°'
<br />�O �O �O �O �O ,LO ,LO �O ,LO ,y0 �O eO cf. ,LO
<br />— Total Paving
<br />and Utility
<br />Related
<br />Expenditures
<br />— Total Paving
<br />Expenditures
<br />— Total Utility Line
<br />Replacement
<br />Expenditures
<br />CITY COUNCIL COMMUNICATION
<br />2
<br />
|