My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Minutes 1993 06 01
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
MINUTES (45.090)
>
1970-1999 City Council Minutes
>
1993 City Council Minutes
>
City Council Minutes 1993 06 01
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 2:31:36 PM
Creation date
8/18/2004 11:31:45 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Minutes
Signed Date
6/1/1993
Original Hardcopy Storage
2E3
Supplemental fields
Test
CCMIN 1993 06 01
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
36
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Lewis: <br /> <br />Hunt: <br /> <br />I would like to point out to the <br />Authority that the form itself, in <br />question 7 has less than an inch of <br />space to provide an explanation. <br />There is, on the front of the form, <br />a requirement that additional <br />documents can be attached. In my <br />experience as an attorney, having <br />seen many forms completed, this <br />seems to be very typical behavior, <br />that the space that's available is <br />filled in and there isn't much more <br />beyond that provided, particularly, <br />with a question that's sensitive or <br />embarrassing. I think that it's <br />important to recognize that the <br />answer to the question was in the <br />affirmative and there was an <br />attempted explanation. It isn't an <br />issue, where he denied it. <br /> <br />I guess I couldn't give a better <br />answer than that other than this is <br />still, 25 years later, a very <br />sensitive issue in my life, a very <br />sensitive issue for my family. It <br />was very difficult for me to come <br />here tonight and to face all of you <br />and discuss this in open forum. I <br />feel that some of you are skirting <br />the issue a little bit. Being <br />concerned about this, when the FBI <br />reports first came back, I made <br />arrangements and spoke with the City <br />Attorney. I appreciated her candor <br />and honesty. She was concerned <br />about my possible evasiveness, which <br />is what you're implying, too. I <br />can't remember my responses to her <br />that morning, other than I had no <br />intentions of being evasive, if <br />evasive means that I still intended <br />to protect, as much as possible, the <br />privacy' for my family. I did say <br />"yes" on the answer. I did tell you <br />that I was arrested. Obviously, <br />you're ,going to have the full <br />report. My explanation would not <br />have changed any of that, made it <br />better or worse. <br /> <br />11 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.