City Council Minutes 1993 09 22 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

63,000 s.f. of undeveloped R-L property. It hasn't been platted yet. If the annexation were authorized for the Zukaitis property, they would have to initiate a platting process and be successful prior to issuance of building permits. That's true for the property to the south. We have no idea if the platting processes would be corresponding in terms of time. The ROW dedications would have to be addressed at the time of platting. Davidson figured it would end up with a 749' dead-end street. He wondered what kind of issues that would raise as far as water, sewer, maintaining the street, etc. Tom Phare, Public Works Director, stated concerning the water, the difference between longer than standard for a dead-end fire line can be addressed through engineering, outside from the pipes. A longer street with a cul-de-sac doesn't present a hugh problem for Public Works. It's a little more difficult during the big snow storms, but not insurmountable. He explained that the cul-de-sac length requirements are more driven by the Fire Department regulations. Mayer: It seems to me that whether the property owner to the south or the property owner in this case will have to attempt to meet the city standards. Otherwise, I think they get the historic use. So, my recommendation would be that we go with the RR zoning. If at some future point the two properties are brought together as a PUD, it might be considered. But, someone would have to show me why we would want to have a 750' cul-de-sac. Davidson called for anyone else who had a question for Mr. Zukaitis. NONE Sisk felt that it should be retained as RR zoning. Sisk moved that Council adopt Resolution No. 25, Series 1993. Seconded by Hedding. 10