My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Minutes 2016 01 19
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
MINUTES (45.090)
>
2016 City Council Minutes
>
City Council Minutes 2016 01 19
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/19/2022 3:13:39 PM
Creation date
2/3/2016 8:04:13 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Minutes
Original Hardcopy Storage
9C1
Supplemental fields
Test
CCMIN 2016 01 19
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
25
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
City Council <br />Special Meeting Minutes <br />January 19, 2016 <br />Page 10 of 25 <br />Council member Loo inquired about the 104 units and the 306 total. Principal Planner <br />McCartney explained the 306 units were derived by adding 104 units to their allowable <br />202 units on North Main. Earlier amendments adjusted the numbers in Steel Ranch <br />South, which added 104 additional units. Steel Ranch South has a total of 306 units. <br />6) Please provide the assumptions for the fiscal model in a table (income, retail $/sqft, <br />absorption year for retail, any modifications to capacity factors from the base, and so <br />on). Staff's response: Attachment #1 (Foundry Fiscal Model Assumptions). <br />7) What is the impact to the general fund (revenue and expense) if the retail is <br />occupied in year 3, 10 or never? Staff's response: Fiscal Model Attachments # 3 <br />year, 10 year, 20 year (Cumulative Combined Funds Results — Fiscal Impact Model.) <br />COUNCIL COMMENTS <br />Council member Stolzmann stressed the importance of having the fiscal model for <br />development projects. She stated her understanding the condo residents will spend <br />approximately $276 per week in Louisville. When the household income is above the <br />median, there is an assumption goods can be bought in Louisville. <br />8) Does the applicant own or have some right to design and rezone the Summit View <br />subdivision? Staff's response: Yes, they own the property. <br />9) The drawings do not clearly depict intemal circulation on the site. Does the alleyish <br />road that runs North South go through? Staff's response: The intemal roadway <br />shown on the PUD is a private drive and provides access north, south, east and <br />west. <br />a. Is it a named street? Staff's response: No. <br />b. Who is responsible for maintenance? Staff's response: The Developer. <br />10)The staff report refers to condominiums, which implies to me that the units being <br />built are individually owned however I do not see the properties segregated on the <br />plat Are these really apartments? Staff response: We have been told they are <br />condominiums. The City of Louisville does not have a condo platting process. <br />These are typically done through the County. <br />11)What guidance is there in the City Code regarding rezoning policy? Staff's <br />response: This is a rezoning only in terms of modifying the General Development <br />Plan (GDP) which is processed as a Planned Community Zone District (PCZD) as <br />established in Section 17.72. This request is an amendment to an existing GDP. <br />City Attorney Light commented on changing plans to address condos and noted it would <br />be a legislative change to provide the regulatory authority on filing a condo plat, which <br />would be a subdivision action. If the PUD is for apartments and there is a desire for <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.