My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Minutes 2016 01 19
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
MINUTES (45.090)
>
2016 City Council Minutes
>
City Council Minutes 2016 01 19
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/19/2022 3:13:39 PM
Creation date
2/3/2016 8:04:13 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Minutes
Original Hardcopy Storage
9C1
Supplemental fields
Test
CCMIN 2016 01 19
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
25
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
City Council <br />Meeting Minutes <br />January 19, 2016 <br />Page 11 of 25 <br />condos, there would have to be a separate condo plat to create a legal interest in the air <br />space. There is still a compliance with the PUD. <br />COUNCIL QUESTIONS <br />Council member Stolzmann asked what enforcements or assurances does the <br />neighborhood have. Interim Planning and Building Safety Director Russ explained it <br />could be conditioned in the resolution. City Attomey Light stated there is probably <br />language in the plan, but confirmed it could be conditioned in the resolution. Mr. <br />McClure confirmed the Final Development Plan refers to the units as condominium <br />units. <br />Mayor Muckle asked if the Final Plan assured park spaces have permanent public <br />access easements. Interim Planning and Building Safety Director Russ confirmed it did. <br />Council member Keany asked if the applicant accepted the six conditions. Mr. McClure <br />confirmed the applicant accepts all six conditions. <br />Council member Maloney noted there were several emails from the public and <br />addressed the concern for the Paschal median and the light requirement. Interim <br />Planning and Building Safety Director Russ explained there have been neighborhood <br />requests for direct left turn access off Paschal into the development. The staff is <br />working with applicant to make that entrance a right in /right out. He stressed a left turn <br />access is not an appropriate movement with a future signal light coming to this location. <br />Council member Maloney inquired about reducing the lighting requirements along Kaylix <br />sidewalks. Principal Planner McCartney stated staff can look at the lighting for traffic <br />and pedestrian safety. <br />PUBLIC COMMENT <br />Gary Larson, 2189 Park Lane, Louisville, CO stated he will be looking at the condos <br />from his back porch. He explained he is a member of the newly formed Steering <br />Committee for the 95th Street Coalition. They want to ensure any residential <br />development is compatible with the existing community and any commercial <br />development is economically viable. At their first meeting, Mr. McClure presented the <br />Foundry proposal. After the meeting, the applicant made changes to incorporate the <br />public concerns. The Coalition feels this development is compatible with the <br />community. They propose a do not block box in the eastbound lane. He addressed the <br />street lights and noted the Steel Ranch patio homes are on timers. He noted at the <br />Planning Commission meeting, they discussed bringing back the water tower. <br />Peter Wengert, 872 Meadow Lark Lane, Louisville, CO stated there is a very good <br />positive feeling about this project. The residents feel it is a people friendly project. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.