Laserfiche WebLink
City Council <br />Special Meeting Minutes <br />January 19, 2016 <br />Page 12 of 25 <br />There are approximately 1,000 walkers in Steel Ranch who are looking forward to <br />walking to the Foundry. He felt this will be a beautiful entry way into the City and voiced <br />his support for the project. <br />Dave Ireland, 2358 Park Lane, Louisville, CO stated he is an enthusiastic supporter of <br />the Foundry project. <br />Sherry Sommers, 910 Palisade Court, Louisville, CO stated her understanding this <br />project is in compliance with the Comprehensive Plan and has the support of the <br />neighbors. She inquired about the role of the small area plan in this development. She <br />noted last spring the City Council stated there would not be more rezoning and <br />urbanization in this area until the impact of the development could be analyzed. She <br />also addressed the project's height and stated her understanding the maximum height <br />for most residential units is two stories. He noted these units will be 2 -3 stories. She <br />stated a lot of people worked hard on the small area plan and the plan should be <br />considered. <br />Sandy Stewart, 649 August Drive, Louisville, CO voiced his support for the project. <br />Alex Bradley, 1385 Caledonia Circle, Louisville, CO inquired why all the units are not <br />age- restrictive. She wanted confirmation all the age- restricted units will be universal in <br />design. She voiced her concern over the Foundry commercial component and noted <br />the square footage was too small. She voiced her concern over the school enrollment <br />at Louisville Elementary. She reported on meeting a local resident, who sends her <br />children to school in Broomfield, because LES is too large. She stressed the BVSD <br />referrals are old and out dated and should be redone. She requested all the age - <br />restricted units be universal in design and for an explanation on why all 32 units cannot <br />be age- restricted to solve the school issue. <br />COUNCIL COMMENT <br />Council member Stolzmann was also interested in knowing why all the units could not <br />be age restricted, the issue of the small area planning and how they are impactful. <br />Mr. McClure stated there is a need for condo units for adults who are not 55 and do not <br />wish to do yardwork anymore. Condos are a product type, which can provide such for <br />those individuals. <br />Interim Planning and Building Safety Director Russ explained the small area plan was <br />not applicable to this application as the plan has not been adopted. <br />Mayor Pro Tem Lipton stated he struggled with balancing the enthusiasm for condos <br />against some significant policy issues related to density, infill and the request for <br />commercial property owners to stimulate their project, by including residential <br />components, not included in the original zoning. He voiced his concern for other <br />commercial property owners who may request equity on how they are treated. He <br />