Laserfiche WebLink
Davidson called for staff presentation. <br /> <br />Paul Wood is coming back to the Council in the same form it was <br />ori.ginally presented on September 22, 1993 at which the time the <br />Council determined to delay consideration of the Ordinance until <br />tonight. This was approved by Planning Commission on August 10, <br />1993. Some of the issues that lead to the result of the delay in <br />consideration was the land exchange agreement and, possibly, as <br />staff indicated, a public meeting would be set along with the <br />Sckool District officials to review the site plan prior to <br />commencement of construction. He was not aware, if that public <br />meeting was held or not. (It was held.) Representation of this <br />would be that the land exchange agreement, which would convey to <br />the Picketts the parcel that their driveway is located on, would be <br />an exchange for the parcel on which a storm detention bern would be <br />located and that should be approved prior to the adoption of second <br />reading of right-of-way vacation. <br /> <br />Davidson informed the Council that the two Ward One Council members <br />and. himself held a meeting with the residences of the area to <br />dis~cuss the proposed ballfields and there was a lot of <br />misinformation out about what the ballfields were going to be, a <br />lot. of concern that the ballfields were going to be lighted and in <br />fact that was going to be the major ball field complex for the City <br />of Louisville. What this really is is mainly an expansion of the <br />physical education field for the Middle School and the City will <br />use the fields during the summer for mainly Tee Ball and things <br />like that. The residents requested that the area never be lighted <br />and. I think that is something we would all agree to. The second <br />iss.ue was the height of the fence and City staff was looking into <br />that and third there was an issue with parking and what was <br />su?gested we would do is request throuqh the leagues and teams that <br />use the fields that they park in the Middle School parking lot. If <br />that appears not to be working out, then we will look at <br />alternative solutions, so that parking does not become a problem <br />for the neighbors and also probably look at how the field is <br />programmed, maybe not schedule it for maximum use. <br /> <br />Hornbostel said that another item brought up by the residents there <br />was. that there is a drainage problem. She thanked the residents <br />that came and feels certain they will be working out that drainage <br />problem. The drainage improvements will be something that the City <br />will have to do with this joint proposal with the School District. <br /> <br />Howard indicated that he as well as Mayer was at this meeting and <br />they are not Ward One representatives. He would also like to talk <br />to the drainage problem, which he feels needs to be put on the <br />front burner and hopes that Annette will start looking into it. <br /> <br />Annette Brand asked Tom Phare, if he would like to comment. And he <br />sa~.d he wasn't aware of a drainage problem at the Middle School <br />Park other than they haven't been able to afford to implement the <br /> <br />7 <br /> <br /> <br />