Laserfiche WebLink
Council could determine if any changes in the <br />City's current Urban Service Area could become <br />more compatible with the DRCOG concept. <br />Leary pointed out that another <br />the Mobley request was turned <br />because of the Urban Service <br />therefore until such time as t <br />changes, this request should <br />this point in time.. <br />request similar to <br />down by Council <br />Area policy and <br />hey current policy <br />also be denied at <br />Morris agreed with Leary's comments that Council <br />should re-evaluatE~ the current policy for future <br />requests, but that: this annexation request should <br />be denied at this Fioint. <br />The Mobley's were riot present to address Council's <br />concerns, however, Appell did relate to Counci_1 <br />that the request was based on economics as the <br />adjacent CTC facilities were, in their opinion, <br />too costly to locate the industry there. <br />Johnson moved that this annexation, request be <br />denied at this time. However, in the future, if <br />the DRCOG proposal shows some basis that thE~ <br />City's service area should be changed, and Council <br />so agrees, this request could be re-introduced to <br />Council. Luce seconded, and the motion was <br />approved unanimously. <br />HARPER LAKE <br />AWARD BID On Tuesday, February 26th, Rocky Mountain <br />Consultants and City Staff opened bids for the <br />earth work and reservoir construction portion of <br />the Harper Lake Project. There were 10 bids. Park <br />Construction Company of Denver was the low bidder <br />at $2,094,000. RMC and staff recommended that <br />Council award the bid to Park Construction. <br />Rocky Mountain consultant, Dan Ault, explained in <br />detail the project and related to Council his <br />confidence that the project would be finished on <br />time. A penalty of $5,000 per day will be imposed <br />for each day over the August 10th deadline. <br />Leary stated that there were some costs <br />comparisons in the newspaper between the Lafayette <br />project and Louisville's. It appeared that the-r <br />(Lafayette) left off all costs except for digging <br />the hole whereas the City's costs included all <br />items including pumping stations and all related <br />work. Ault concurred and further related that <br />Louisville is taking water out of South Boulder <br />Creek, a clear water supply, whereas the storage <br />site in Lafayette is downstream from Boulder's <br />5 <br />