Laserfiche WebLink
C. Raymond Sears, Architect, representing the applicants, 945 <br />McKinley Avenue, Louisville, Colorado, disclosed that up until <br />January 1993 he was on the City of Louisville's Board of Appeals <br />and he did not represent these owners or this property during that <br />time. He also disclosed that two weeks ago he made an application <br />to the BOA for this same owner on his residence at 705 Grant. He <br />reviewed the project drawings for 908 Main Street. <br /> <br />Davidson called for Council comments or questions. <br /> <br />Sisk wondered about employee parking. <br /> <br />Sears stated that the employees would park off-site. Presently <br />there are 12 employees, with 20 - 25 expected after the addition of <br />the second floor. <br /> <br />Arlin Lehman, 705 Grant, Louisville, Colorado, stated that in the <br />long term they don't anticipate to grow beyond 25 - 30 employees. <br /> <br />Sisk didn't want the employees parking on Main Street. <br /> <br />Mayer was also concerned about the parking. <br /> <br />Keany was concerned about the height of three stories. He was <br />concerned about the structural integrity of the building, as he had <br />found a large crack on one side of the building. <br /> <br />Sears was aware of the crack, it will be remedied and the integrity <br />of the building will be in tact. <br /> <br />Lathrop felt Council needed to look at accommodating future <br />development by additional parking for downtown. <br /> <br />Howard moved that Council approve the final PUD Development Plan <br />fox' 908 Main Street, Resolution No. 21, Series 1994 with the <br />Planning Commission amendment. Seconded by Levihn. All in favor. <br /> <br />DISCUSSION/DIRECTION -LETTER TO BOULDER VArWmy SCHOOL DISTRICT IN <br />SUPPORT OF IMPACT FEES <br /> <br />Mayer encouraged Council, through Councilman Sisk, to deliver a <br />letter (SEE ATTACHED) in support of the impact fees to the BVSD and <br />explain the City's position. <br /> <br />Howard was in.support of the impact fees. <br /> <br />Lathrop could not support the impact fees, because of the lack of <br />a provision that scales the impact fee to the people's ability to <br />pas'. <br /> <br />Keany wondered, if impact fees are instituted and it is not <br />instituted throughout the rest of the School District, how could <br /> <br />9 <br /> <br /> <br />