Laserfiche WebLink
City Council <br />Meeting Minutes <br />August 16, 2016 <br />Page 10 of 12 <br />Councilmember Stolzmann asked if this requires a further commitment from our staff. <br />Mayor Muckle stated this should not be a larger commitment from us as a practical <br />matter. <br />Councilmember Stolzmann stated the City recently passed a resolution regarding <br />completion of the Northwest Rail to Boulder County, and parts of this document appear <br />to be counter to that. It doesn't seem to support Northwest Rail. She added it doesn't <br />seem to her that the document supports HOV3 in the manner we want. She noted the <br />MCC meetings are not open to the public and she doesn't feel that is consistent with our <br />goals. <br />Councilmember Leh stated his appreciation for Councilmember Stolzmann's comments <br />and noted the MCC does do a great deal of work. He stated he would hate to support <br />the MCC in a way that would get in the way of the City's goals. He asked if this <br />document would specifically help the MCC. Mayor Muckle noted it would help direct the <br />MCC's lobbyist and staff during the legislative session when items move through the <br />legislature quickly before the MCC can react as a group. Councilmember Leh asked <br />how the Mayor would respond if the MCC took a position at odds with the City. Mayor <br />Muckle stated the MCC works as a consensus group, so if Louisville is against <br />something the MCC as a group would likely not lobby on it or the group as a whole <br />would have to change the policy to reach consensus. Mayor Muckle stated there are not <br />likely to be any issues the MCC decides to pursue that the City doesn't support. <br />Mayor Muckle noted the language regarding HOV3 was meant as a push back to the <br />state regarding the automatic switch to HOV3 next year regardless of the traffic levels, <br />not that there was not support for it. The MCC simply doesn't want the change to occur <br />until the capacity requires it. He added his reading of the language regarding rail <br />appears to fully support completion of the Northwest Rail. <br />Councilmember Loo stated we have been very successful on the US36 corridor and in <br />transportation generally because of the MCC and we should not end support of the <br />MCC now. <br />Councilmember Leh stated his faith that the Mayor will represent the needs of Louisville <br />with the MCC and noted the group has been critical in getting work done. He stated he <br />would like to find a way to clarify how the Council controls statements made on its <br />behalf; there should be a process and some working principals to use when that <br />happens. <br />Mayor Muckle stated he will try to make more consistent reports on what the MCC is <br />doing, however it is hard to do that in a timely manner given the meeting schedule. This <br />item is really about giving the MCC lobbyist the direction they need to work with <br />legislators not so much that each of these items is an absolute priority <br />