Laserfiche WebLink
Levihn did not see any evidence of any previous Council comments or handshakes, or any thing, <br />which he wanted to see before he could go with this. <br /> <br />Morris offered to make those documents available. <br /> <br />Griffiths asked Morris if he would continue to wish to have his land annexed to the city if it was to <br />be zoned to a density lower than SF-MD, such as R-RR, in accordance with the Comprehensive Plan.. <br /> <br />Morris: <br /> <br />I would not chose to have it zoned that way. No. <br /> <br />Griffiths: <br /> <br />Would you wish to have it annexed, if it was to be <br />zoned that way? <br /> <br />Morris: No. <br /> <br />Mayer stated that there are no formal agreements in place that show that the city owes anything. The <br />residents have stated that they want the land zoned R-RR. He stated that R-RR would preserve the <br />natural beauty of the area and minimize the impact on the schools. <br /> <br />Sisk was agreeable to the annexation and felt the zoning should be A-OT between Washington and <br />Kennedy, with the balance from Kennedy westward being R-RR. <br /> <br />Lathrop did not feel R-RR zoning was appropriate for that area. He felt the A-0T zoning was <br />reasonably acceptable. He did support annexation. <br /> <br />Griffiths clarified that what was before Council was three separate items: Resolution No. 54, stating <br />the annexation petition is in compliance with state law, sets a hearing for December 6 to finally <br />determine whether the proposed annexation complies with state law, and to have a hearing on that <br />issue; Ordinance No. 1165, is annexing the property. This is the first reading, with second reading <br />being on December 6, 1994; and Ordinance No. 1166, zoning the property, with first reading at this <br />meeting and second reading on December 6, 1994. She commented that through this process Mr. <br />Morris would be able to withdraw his petition between first and second reading, if he so chose. <br /> <br />RESOLUTION NO. 54, SERIES 1994 - SUBSTANTIAL COMPLIANCE - <br />LOUISVIEW CORPORATION - ANNEXATION <br /> <br />Mayer moved that Council approve Resolution No. 54, Series 1994 and set a public hearing for <br />December 6, 1994. Seconded by Sisk. All in favor with Davidson being absent. <br /> <br />ORDINANCE NO. 1165, SERIES 1994 - ANNEXATION OF LOUISVIEW <br />CORPORATION PROPERTY - 1ST READING - SET PUBLIC HEARING 12/6/94 <br /> <br />10 <br /> <br /> <br />