My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Minutes 1992 03 17
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
MINUTES (45.090)
>
1970-1999 City Council Minutes
>
1992 City Council Minutes
>
City Council Minutes 1992 03 17
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 2:31:34 PM
Creation date
7/28/2005 11:25:15 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Minutes
Signed Date
3/17/1992
Original Hardcopy Storage
2E3
Supplemental fields
Test
CCMIN 1992 03 17
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
21
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
approved tonight, Burger King will <br />have to go back to corporate to get <br />the sight re-evaluated for their <br />approval. It could be a 60 to 90 <br />day delay or may never be approved <br />by Burger King. If the monument <br />sign is not approved tonight, it <br />could be a possible loss of sales <br />tax revenue of approximately <br />$3,000.00 per month to the City. <br />More importantly to me, the loss of <br />a major sale at a very timely period <br />of trying to complete the Center. I <br />would appreciate your approval with <br />approval of the monument sign as <br />proposed, so that we can finish up <br />the sight and open up a successful <br />center. Kmart will have a grand <br />opening April 2. We have one tenant <br />that has opened and a couple more <br />that will be opening within a week <br />or so. There will be five tenants <br />and Kmart open by the 2nd of April. <br />Joe Lucas of Burger King and Rick <br />Hattman, the Architect of the <br />project, are here to answer any <br />questions that Council may have. <br /> <br />Davidson called for Council comments or questions. <br /> <br />Howard: <br /> <br />When we had Hardee's in here, they <br />had a monument sign that I thought <br />was a little larger than 6 ft. by 6 <br />ft. <br /> <br />Cudlip: <br /> <br />Correct. <br /> <br />Howard: <br /> <br />I don't understand what the problem <br />with a smaller sign is. Does this <br />currently fit our sign ordinance? <br /> <br />Franklin: <br /> <br />It does. The current sign code <br />would allow a larger and taller sign <br />than the one proposed for the Burger <br />King. <br /> <br />Lathrop: <br /> <br />When Hardee's came through, did they <br />have building signage on three <br />sides? On the west, east, and south <br />or just the west and the east? I <br />remember a discussion at the <br />Planning Commission meeting <br /> <br />5 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.