My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Minutes 1992 04 07
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
MINUTES (45.090)
>
1970-1999 City Council Minutes
>
1992 City Council Minutes
>
City Council Minutes 1992 04 07
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 2:31:34 PM
Creation date
7/29/2005 9:51:47 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Minutes
Signed Date
4/7/1992
Original Hardcopy Storage
2E3
Supplemental fields
Test
CCMIN 1992 04 07
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
31
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
from now when the City is missing <br />$250,000.00 in service expansion <br />fees and an increase in bonds. <br /> <br />Ott: <br /> <br />The increase food service area will <br />generate an additional $35,000.00 to <br />the bottom line. Therefore, by <br />taking what we have in reserve from <br />the expansion fees and profits, we <br />have a surplus in reserve which is <br />over and above the debt service. By <br />investing $100,000.00 of that <br />reserve into food service, we'll <br />realize annually an additional <br />$35,000.00 to the bottom line. <br /> <br />Sisk: <br /> <br />Is there any money that will go <br />additionally to RSL of the <br />$100,000.007 If Council approves <br />the expansion project and the income <br />goes up from the beverages and food, <br />does RSL take anymore money than if <br />Council doesn't approve the <br />$100,000.007 <br /> <br />Ott: <br /> <br />No. It will have no financial <br />impact on RSL. <br /> <br />Howard: <br /> <br />The golf course in Oklahoma has very <br />little to do, in reality, with the <br />front range in Colorado. That's why <br />I specifically asked for information <br />out here. Additional revenue of <br />$35,000.00 per year sounds <br />wonderful. I don't feel I have <br />enough information to justify the <br />expenditure. I see a $100,000.00 <br />expenditure today in the hopes that <br />RSL's guesstimate is correct. But, <br />I don't see anything to justify it. <br /> <br />Ott: <br /> <br />There is no better example than the <br />current history of two years of <br />operation at Coal Creek. For three <br />years in a row, we have been giving <br />the Council budget numbers and have <br />never missed on those numbers in <br />gross revenues, expenses, and net <br />operating expenses. <br /> <br />Mayer: <br /> <br />RSL's Agreement will be coming up in <br />the near future, and from my point <br /> <br />17 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.