My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Minutes 1992 04 23
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
MINUTES (45.090)
>
1970-1999 City Council Minutes
>
1992 City Council Minutes
>
City Council Minutes 1992 04 23
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 2:31:34 PM
Creation date
7/29/2005 10:55:54 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Minutes
Signed Date
4/23/1992
Original Hardcopy Storage
2E3
Supplemental fields
Test
CCMIN 1992 04 23
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
35
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
John Franklin, Director of Community Development, stated that State <br />Statutes required that the Council adopt a resolution which <br />declares intent to annex and sets a Public Hearing. The next two <br />Agenda Items (Ordinances 1073 & 1074, Series, 1992) are also part <br />of this process. The annexor and the applicant, the Meadows at <br />Coal Creek Corporation, are represented tonight and are prepared to <br />answer any question that Council might have in preparation for the <br />Public Hearing, should Council wish to set that. That Public <br />Hearing would be scheduled for June 2, 1992. <br /> <br />Susan Griffiths, City Attorney, asked Franklin if on Section 4 of <br />Resolution No. 29 where Council refers the annexation to the <br />Planning Commission was that correct? <br /> <br />Franklin: No, the Planning Commission has <br /> reviewed this. <br /> <br />Griffiths: <br /> <br />So, the Council could amend <br />Resolution No. 29 to delete Section <br />4. <br /> <br />Franklin: <br /> <br />That would be proper. Also, a <br />representative of the Planning <br />Commission is here prepared to <br />provide the Planning Commission's <br />prospective on this case. <br /> <br />Hornbostel: <br /> <br />Davidson: <br /> <br />Recently, Council has been made <br />aware of the problem within the <br />schools as far as someone moving <br />into the area and their children not <br />being able to go to school in the <br />Louisville schools. It's an issue <br />that Council needs to address before <br />Council does many more annexations. <br />Does Council have a problem with <br />continuing this discussion until <br />Council meets with the School Board? <br />Council needs to have some idea <br />where Louisville is going before <br />Council accepts another annexation. <br /> <br />The actual ordinances would be sent <br />out for Public Hearing and a Public <br />Notice and Hearing would be <br />conducted on June 2, 1991, which <br />would be after the initial meeting <br />with the schools. <br /> <br />Hornbostel: <br /> <br />Does the Resolution bind Council? <br /> <br />Griffiths: <br /> <br />No, it does not. The only effect of <br /> <br />3 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.