Laserfiche WebLink
City Council Finance Committee <br />Meeting Minutes <br />01/17/17 <br />Page 3 of 6 <br />Member Maloney stated that would like to see a graph showing capital reserve. <br />Finance Director Watson stated this type of graph may be more appropriate to be <br />presented annually as a change and designation of working capital. <br />Members agreed that the 2nd graph provided by the Golf Course is not necessary <br />if the changes discussed can be incorporated into graph 1. <br />Members discussed the dashboard report provided by the Golf Course. Finance <br />Committee Member Maloney requested that the dashboard be further <br />consolidated by combining "Green Fees", "Golf Cart Fees", and "Range" into one <br />category, and by combining "Golf Shop Sales" with the "All Other Revenue" <br />category. Member Maloney stated that "Annual Pass" and "Food & Beverage" <br />should remain in separate categories. <br />Member Maloney stated that the "Actual YTD" number for "All Other Revenue" <br />seems very high. Director Watson stated that he and Senior Accountant Clark <br />would look into the number provided. Members further discussed consolidating <br />the expenditure section of the dashboard report by creating three expenditure <br />categories: (1) Golf Course Maintenance, (2) Marketing, and (3) Pro Shop/ <br />Clubhouse Maintenance. <br />Finance Committee Members moved on to the review of the water usage and <br />revenue graphs provided by Public Works. City Manager Fleming stated that the <br />graphs do not represent actual data, but were submitted to the Finance <br />Committee to determine if the form and content reflect the needs of the Finance <br />Committee Members. Information Technology Director Neves stated that he was <br />attending the meeting to better understand the reporting needs of the Committee, <br />and to ensure that the data sets are incorporated into Tyler for reporting <br />purposes. <br />Finance Committee Member Stolzmann stated that the 1st graph is good, but that <br />she would like the Water Usage by Customer Class graph to be a bar chart. <br />Committee members also agreed that the Revenue by Customer Class (grouped <br />bars) and Total Water Usage (line), the Water Usage (Area) and Revenue (Bar) <br />by Customer Class, the Water Usage by Customer Class, and the Revenue by <br />Customer Class (stacked bars) and Total Water Usage (line) graphs on page 14, <br />15, 16 and 18 of the packet respectively, are not needed. <br />Members discussed the Revenue Target Chart provided. Chairperson <br />Stolzmann stated that the graph can be useful if either dollars or percentages are <br />added to the bottom axis, and perhaps a green line added that would reflect the <br />anticipated usage revenue. Member Stolzmann stated that the three selected <br />charts discussed by the Finance Committee should be provided for Water, <br />Wastewater, Storm Water and Trash utilities. <br />4 <br />