Laserfiche WebLink
3/6/84 Page -10- <br />Councilman Leary suggested the 15 year <br />plan be another concern to be added to the <br />memorandum - peferred 25 years going to the <br />year 2010. <br />City Administrator Directed Councilman Leary moved, Councilman Cussen <br />to Proceed seconded that the City .Administrator be dir-e~ted to <br />proceed on the elements of his memorandum <br />and adding looking into a 25 year plan <br />ho:riz on . <br />Councilman Woodson Inquired if the land is purchased as open <br />space, why is there a time period of 25 <br />years when that is reviewed again? Administrator <br />Wu:r1 stated if the land were acquired <br />it would forever be open space. Felt that <br />they were dealing with the planning component <br />in terms of when you would agree to leave <br />things in the agricultural zone, or the <br />planning zone versus the urban services area. <br />The 15 year plan seemed to be the one used <br />by Boulder County in all their discussions. <br />Vote on the Motion Question called for. All in favor. Motion <br />carried unanimously 7-0. <br />PUBLIC COMMENTS <br />Ivan Urnovitz, 1016 Main St. Mr. Urnovitz stated that at the last council <br />Museum - Historical Commission meeting when the lease for the Museum was <br />being discussed, he heard some comments <br />that left him somewhat disturbed and he <br />fe:Lt that there was a lack of communication <br />by the Historical Commission. They had worked <br />with the city staff and felt that council <br />wars aware of what they were doing and what <br />they were planning. In the future they will <br />be making presentations periodically so that <br />council will be aware of their plans, goals, <br />and how they intend to achieve those goals. <br />Would make a full presentation at the March <br />20-th meeting; wished to comment on a few <br />conerns that Councilmen Luce and Leary ex- <br />pressed. The changes that were made to <br />Lease lease were acceptable to the Historical <br />Commission. When the length of the lease <br />wars being discussed in the Commission and <br />discussing it with the City Attorney a period <br />of time was not specified. But the 99 year <br />figure came up as something that seemed to <br />show that the City was making a good commit- <br />ment to the Museum. They felt this was im- <br />portant because they think they are going <br />to have a creditability problem. <br />