My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Agenda and Packet 2017 12 11
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
AGENDAS & PACKETS (45.010)
>
2010-2019 City Council Agendas and Packets
>
2017 City Council Agendas and Packets
>
City Council Agenda and Packet 2017 12 11
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 2:12:27 PM
Creation date
12/14/2017 1:46:19 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Packet
Original Hardcopy Storage
7B5
Supplemental fields
Test
CCAGPKT 2017 12 11
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
24
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
4 <br />in mind, it is so important to develop <br />more creative uses of land. For <br />with deliberate planning, that can last <br />example, the mixed use area near <br />the test of time. Bridging old and new <br />Alfalfa's and the planned DELO <br />development, creating a lasting <br />live/work development provide for <br />product, planning for the long term <br />different types of community <br />future (50-100 years), is what I would <br />interaction than if areas were strictly <br />like to see the Planning Commission <br />work toward, with more attention to <br />detail in the planning process. <br />residential or strictly commercial. <br />Residential development routinely <br />Developers are working toward a <br />financial goal but the city needs to <br />raises concerns about density, traffic, <br />and school crowding. On the other <br />guide the final outcome. Sometimes <br />hand, no or minimal residential <br />its ok to say no to developers, for the <br />development leads to higher housing <br />ultimate greater good of the city. <br />prices, which while benefiting <br />existing homeowners with increased <br />Downtown parking structure or <br />home values, also leads to other <br />system: I don't live downtown, but <br />negative consequences, even to <br />what deterred us from buying <br />existing homeowners. These <br />downtown (aside from the exorbitant <br />residential development issues are <br />prices) is the lack of a parking system. <br />more and more common in Colorado <br />Louisville should look toward a <br />and not unique to Louisville. <br />parking study that provides a multi- <br />Obviously, there are not simple <br />pronged plan. I believe it should be <br />solutions to these issues, and most <br />Louisville's priority in the coming <br />solutions to these problems cannot <br />years. <br />be implemented simply through the <br />planning process for an individual <br />applicant. <br />have not seen much redevelopment <br />in my time on Planning Commission. <br />Some areas of the City that were <br />developed at a different time may <br />struggle in today's environment. A <br />good example is the former Sam's <br />Club property, which has not had a <br />retail tenant for years. If additional <br />retail tenants leave similar style <br />buildings vacant, redevelopment or <br />creative solutions to the existing <br />space may be needed. <br />4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.