Laserfiche WebLink
City Council <br />Meeting Minutes <br />January 2, 2018 <br />Page 9 of 11 <br />beyond the building footprint. He noted the new mechanical equipment to be installed <br />on the rooftop is very quiet. <br />Councilmember Maloney noted the new HVAC looks to be much quieter than the <br />existing ones which are installed behind the building. Callahan stated those will be <br />installed in the well in the roof to keep it quiet and to reduce the impact on the <br />surrounding area <br />Deb Fahey, 1118 West Enclave Circle, stated the south side of the building would be <br />great for solar panels <br />Councilmember Maloney moved to approve the resolution; Councilmember Loo <br />seconded the motion. Voice vote, all in favor. <br />ORDINANCE NO. 1751, SERIES 2017 — AN ORDINANCE ADOPTING BY <br />REFERENCE THE 2017 NATIONAL ELECTRIC CODE — 2ND READING, PUBLIC <br />HEARING (advertised Daily Camera 12/3/17) <br />City Attorney Light introduced the ordinance by title. Mayor Muckle opened the public <br />hearing <br />Chief Building Official Chad Root stated this ordinance adopts the State of Colorado's <br />Electrical Code, which is currently the 2017 National Electrical Code (NEC). Adoption of <br />this Ordinance is required in order to be in compliance with the State of Colorado <br />requirement that local jurisdictions follow the State's adopted code. The State of <br />Colorado adopts the State Electrical Code on July 1 on a three-year cycle. Colorado <br />requires junsdictions in the State to adopt the State Electncal Code within one year from <br />the date that the State adopted the code The City never adopted the 2014 NEC when <br />the State adopted the code. The City is currently still working off the 2011 NEC as of <br />two months ago and doing reviews under the 2011 NEC. Thus, the City needs to adopt <br />the 2017 NEC in order to be up to code with the State of Colorado. The proposed <br />ordinance will adopt the NEC as it was adopted by the State of Colorado. The Building <br />Code Board of Appeals and the Fire District are aware of this change and understand <br />this is a State regulation. <br />Mayor Muckle asked for public comments — None. <br />Mayor Pro Tem Lipton asked if Root foresees any unintended consequences with this <br />adoption; will the changes be significant or minor or in between Root stated this new <br />version requires new breakers that are more expensive for residents The number of <br />breakers doesn't change, but they are quite a bit more expensive. This code doesn't <br />require work be completed for any area of a building not included in a permit. <br />