My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Agenda and Packet 2018 07 03
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
AGENDAS & PACKETS (45.010)
>
2010-2019 City Council Agendas and Packets
>
2018 City Council Agendas and Packets
>
City Council Agenda and Packet 2018 07 03
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 2:12:28 PM
Creation date
7/9/2018 8:19:54 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Packet
Original Hardcopy Storage
7D3
Supplemental fields
Test
CCAGPKT 2018 07 03
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
256
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
City Council <br />Meeting Minutes <br />June 12, 2018 <br />Page 3 of 6 <br />first floors at 14-15 feet. Office tenants also want taller ceilings and need space for duct <br />work so developers need adequate space and height to attract tenants. Dean stated we <br />have the ability to make sure the design of taller buildings gives us a nice aesthetic. <br />Staff can look at a range of heights that allow for three-story buildings adding we likely <br />want a mix of two and three-story buildings in these areas. <br />Questions for Council for feedback tonight: <br />1. Is Council supportive of the heights envisioned by the South Boulder Road Small <br />Area Plan and McCaslin Small Area Plan Height Plans? <br />2. Should a Special Review Use be required for two and three story buildings where <br />specified under the South Boulder Road Small Area Plan or should more <br />consistency in process be provided between commercial areas? <br />3. For properties zoned AO and within the South Boulder Road Small Area Plan, <br />should a Code Amendment also be processed which would allow for taller <br />buildings in accordance with the vision set forth in the Building Height Plan? <br />4. For the properties zoned BO in the McCaslin Blvd. Small Area Plan, should 40- <br />foot tall buildings continue to be permitted where the height plan limits buildings <br />to a maximum of 2-stories? <br />5. Should the maximum height permitted for three -stories be increased from 35 feet <br />to 45 feet, including parapets or to some other specific height standard? <br />6. Where increased height is permitted, should additional architectural standards <br />such as setbacks on the third level or additional architectural features be <br />required? <br />Mayor Muckle stated that in general he is satisfied with the building stories as <br />envisioned in the Comprehensive Plan; we don't need to revisit or amend the <br />Comprehensive Plan but we need to clarify the heights. <br />Councilmember Stolzmann stated that the thought was the Small Area Plan process <br />would lead to other changes we need to make. She asked if this is that step in the <br />process. Dean stated yes, this is the way to take advisory policies and potentially put <br />them into regulatory policies. Director Zuccaro stated this is the chance to align the <br />different documents and decide what processes to put in place. <br />Public Comments <br />Jeff Sheets, Koelbel and Company, stated it is important to make a three story building <br />achievable; give enough height to reach three stories. He stated builders need 14-15 <br />feet for each story. He asked for practical rules that make it achievable. He added that <br />requiring the Special Review Use process for a development can make it hard to get <br />tenants. <br />Mayor Muckle stated he supports allowing heights that support the number of stories we <br />allow in those locations. He would like a recommendation from staff on when or if the <br />Special Review Use process is needed. He stated it is a good idea to align the vision <br />13 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.