My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Agenda and Packet 2018 07 03
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
AGENDAS & PACKETS (45.010)
>
2010-2019 City Council Agendas and Packets
>
2018 City Council Agendas and Packets
>
City Council Agenda and Packet 2018 07 03
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 2:12:28 PM
Creation date
7/9/2018 8:19:54 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Packet
Original Hardcopy Storage
7D3
Supplemental fields
Test
CCAGPKT 2018 07 03
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
256
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
City Council <br />Meeting Minutes <br />June 12, 2018 <br />Page 4 of 6 <br />documents with the regulatory documents. He likes requiring articulation and set backs <br />on buildings that front streets in some areas. <br />Mayor Pro Tem Lipton stated the design guidelines have never fully addressed height <br />and what 35 feet will actually get you. He noted building practices have changed a lot <br />since the guidelines were written. All three-story buildings now need more vertical <br />space. If we want attractive three-story buildings we need more flexibility in the height. <br />He asked what tools the City needs to make sure we get proper aesthetics. He noted <br />the tools we have can influence the design by not allowing use by right. He wants to <br />enforce good, innovative, and creative architecture if we allow taller building heights. <br />Director Zuccaro stated the goal is to have more enforceable standards in the policies; <br />we want to quantify the rules so applicants know what regulations they have to meet. <br />We want everyone to know three stories is not limited to 35 feet any more. <br />Regarding process, Zuccaro stated the Special Review Use was designed to address <br />uses not design and it is likely not appropriate for standards that are not use related. He <br />stated waivers create a lack of predictability for the developers but can be good when it <br />allows the City to ask for higher quality development to justify the waiver. Use by right <br />regulations give predictability in the process but give staff little ability to negotiate on <br />community character in the process. One option is to align the underlying zoning to <br />allow a maximum height to facilitate a three-story building but have other design <br />requirements if the building goes above a certain height. <br />Councilmember Maloney stated that when the South Boulder Road Small Area Plan <br />discussed stories it didn't include height, but rather discussed transition zones. We need <br />help in the transition zones so they are the right height for the transition area with <br />respect to the neighbors. He stated he would also like some architectural articulation in <br />the transition zones. He asked how do we build something that adds to the community <br />character and not distract from it. The intention in these areas needs to be defined <br />better; the more processes we can define in the rules that don't need a Special Review <br />Use the better. <br />Councilmember Stolzmann stated the intent in the South Boulder Road Small Area Plan <br />was to have transition zones with height buffers next to the residential areas. It was <br />intentional to have lower heights next to the road and the residential areas. Mayor <br />Muckle agreed that was the intent at the time. <br />Director Zuccaro stated the policy intent will be clarified in the new draft and should <br />include height limitation in the transition zones. <br />Mayor Pro Tem Lipton asked if the heights we are contemplating would allow for <br />additional height for the mechanical systems on top of a building. Dean stated the <br />current regulations allow for additional heights for the parapets to shield mechanical <br />14 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.